Evaluation of low-carbon cementitious composites in marine environment for coastal protection and artificial reef substrate

This study investigates the long-term durability, microstructural evolution, and biological receptivity of three cementitious materials—Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), Alkali-Activated Material (AAM), and Recreated Roman Cement (RRC)—under natural marine exposure for one year. A comprehensive bottom-up approach was employed, starting with microstructural characterization using XRD, MIP, microCT, TGA, SEM, and FTIR. These analyses were followed by evaluations of mechanical performance, carbon footprint, and biological growth potential. After one year, OPC paste samples exhibited ettringite, thaumasite, and gypsum formation, causing full-depth cracks. Despite this, OPC mortar maintained the highest compressive strength (70 MPa) among all binders. In contrast, RRC showed no ettringite or thaumasite formation; only increased hydrotalcite formation at its edges was observed. Nevertheless, RRC achieved a strength level comparable to OPC (55 MPa). Sodium hydroxide-activated blast furnace slag was used as the AAM composite for this study. The tested AAM formulation imparted the lowest compressive strength (35 MPa), attributed to the drying shrinkage crack formation during the initial sealed curing, which exacerbated upon seawater exposure. Notably, AAM showed increased calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) formation with time. Both RRC and AAM mortars exhibited lower environmental footprints, achieving reductions in global warming potential (GWP) of 50% and 52%, respectively, compared to OPC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Materials Degradation
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-025-00652-0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of low-carbon cementitious composites in marine environment for coastal protection and artificial reef substrate

Naveed Ahmed, Christopher M. Hollenbeck, Warda Ashraf, Adhora Tahsin et al.
3 citations
npj Materials Degradation
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
2.86
article

Evaluation of low-carbon cementitious composites in marine environment for coastal protection and artificial reef substrate

Naveed Ahmed, Christopher M. Hollenbeck, Warda Ashraf, Adhora Tahsin, N. Nair, Ishrat Baki Borno
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the long-term durability, microstructural evolution, and biological receptivity of three cementitious materials—Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), Alkali-Activated Material (AAM), and Recreated Roman Cement (RRC)—under natural marine exposure for one year. A comprehensive bottom-up approach was employed, starting with microstructural characterization using XRD, MIP, microCT, TGA, SEM, and FTIR. These analyses were followed by evaluations of mechanical performance, carbon footprint, and biological growth potential. After one year, OPC paste samples exhibited ettringite, thaumasite, and gypsum formation, causing full-depth cracks. Despite this, OPC mortar maintained the highest compressive strength (70 MPa) among all binders. In contrast, RRC showed no ettringite or thaumasite formation; only increased hydrotalcite formation at its edges was observed. Nevertheless, RRC achieved a strength level comparable to OPC (55 MPa). Sodium hydroxide-activated blast furnace slag was used as the AAM composite for this study. The tested AAM formulation imparted the lowest compressive strength (35 MPa), attributed to the drying shrinkage crack formation during the initial sealed curing, which exacerbated upon seawater exposure. Notably, AAM showed increased calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) formation with time. Both RRC and AAM mortars exhibited lower environmental footprints, achieving reductions in global warming potential (GWP) of 50% and 52%, respectively, compared to OPC.

npj Materials DegradationVol. 9(1)
The University of Texas at Arlington (US), Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi (US)
University of Texas at Arlington, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Advanced Research Projects Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.