Malevolent Innovation in the Workplace: Laying the Foundation

Scholarly interest in the areas of innovation and harmful workplace behaviors has grown rapidly in recent years. Despite parallel growth in interest, research has largely failed to address the intersection of these phenomena. Moreover, although malevolent innovation is conceptually distinct in the fields of crime, terrorism, and extremism, there is limited clarity for how it differs from established workplace constructs (e.g., workplace incivility, counterproductive work behavior). In this review, we consider related workplace constructs and examine how they overlap with and, more centrally, differ from malevolent innovation. We distinguish deviance and other forms of norm-violating behaviors from the primary elements of malevolent innovation: novelty and intentional harm, as well as secondary elements: intensity, perpatrator-target relationship, and planning. Together, we provide a review to distinguish malevolent innovation as a unique workplace construct. Areas for future research are also discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organizational Psychology Review
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866251370355
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Malevolent Innovation in the Workplace: Laying the Foundation

Samuel T. Hunter, Alexis L. d’Amato
1 citations
Organizational Psychology Review
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
2.76
article

Malevolent Innovation in the Workplace: Laying the Foundation

Samuel T. Hunter, Alexis L. d’Amato
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Scholarly interest in the areas of innovation and harmful workplace behaviors has grown rapidly in recent years. Despite parallel growth in interest, research has largely failed to address the intersection of these phenomena. Moreover, although malevolent innovation is conceptually distinct in the fields of crime, terrorism, and extremism, there is limited clarity for how it differs from established workplace constructs (e.g., workplace incivility, counterproductive work behavior). In this review, we consider related workplace constructs and examine how they overlap with and, more centrally, differ from malevolent innovation. We distinguish deviance and other forms of norm-violating behaviors from the primary elements of malevolent innovation: novelty and intentional harm, as well as secondary elements: intensity, perpatrator-target relationship, and planning. Together, we provide a review to distinguish malevolent innovation as a unique workplace construct. Areas for future research are also discussed.

Organizational Psychology ReviewVol. 15(4)
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Malevolent Innovation in the Workplace: Laying the Foundation — Samuel T. Hunter, Alexis L. d’Amato · Organizational Psychology Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS