Out-of-Sequence Placement of Deceased Donor Kidneys Is Exacerbating Inequities in the United States

Key Points Out-of-sequence transplantation of deceased donor kidneys has increased dramatically from 2020 to 2023 without regard for organ quality. A limited number of centers are responsible for a third of all out-of-sequence transplants, exacerbating inequality in access to transplants. There has been no improvement in the utilization of deceased donor kidneys despite the increase of out-of-sequence placements. Background Deceased donor kidney (DDK) allocation in the United States follows an objective algorithm that is designed to balance equity and utility. Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are increasingly using out-of-sequence allocation of DDKs to improve organ utilization rates. We investigated trends in the prevalence of out-of-sequence allocation in DDKs, the association with successful organ placement, and its impact on equity and organ utilization. Methods Using 2020–2023 transplant data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and organ offer data from the potential transplant recipient dataset, we identified all organ offers for DDKs, including those placed out-of-sequence, along with donor and recipient characteristics. We obtained the prevalence of out-of-sequence allocation and placement in DDKs and assessed temporal trends across organ quality as measured by the kidney donor profile index. Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients measured inequality for out-of-sequence transplantation at the transplant center and OPO levels. Results From 2020 to 2023, out-of-sequence placement of DDKs increased from 328 kidneys in 2020 (2%) to 3470 in 2023 (18%). Out-of-sequence placements now account for greater than one in six DDK transplants and include kidneys across the organ quality spectrum, with 40% of these occurring with kidney donor profile index <50% ( i.e ., the highest quality) kidneys. By 2023, all 55 OPOs were using out-of-sequence allocation, reflected in the Gini coefficient decreasing from 0.88 to 0.43 with no appreciable impact on utilization rates. Conclusions There has been a sharp increase in out-of-sequence allocation of DDKs including high-quality organs. Most of these kidneys are being placed at a small number of transplant centers, creating preferential access to transplantation and exacerbating inequities in access to transplantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000869
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Out-of-Sequence Placement of Deceased Donor Kidneys Is Exacerbating Inequities in the United States

Miko Yu, Jesse D. Schold, Sumit Mohan, Lindsey M. Maclay et al.
6 citations
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Organ Donation and Transplantation
11.27
article

Out-of-Sequence Placement of Deceased Donor Kidneys Is Exacerbating Inequities in the United States

Miko Yu, Jesse D. Schold, Sumit Mohan, Lindsey M. Maclay, David C. Cron, Syed Ali Husain, Joel T. Adler
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Key Points Out-of-sequence transplantation of deceased donor kidneys has increased dramatically from 2020 to 2023 without regard for organ quality. A limited number of centers are responsible for a third of all out-of-sequence transplants, exacerbating inequality in access to transplants. There has been no improvement in the utilization of deceased donor kidneys despite the increase of out-of-sequence placements. Background Deceased donor kidney (DDK) allocation in the United States follows an objective algorithm that is designed to balance equity and utility. Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are increasingly using out-of-sequence allocation of DDKs to improve organ utilization rates. We investigated trends in the prevalence of out-of-sequence allocation in DDKs, the association with successful organ placement, and its impact on equity and organ utilization. Methods Using 2020–2023 transplant data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and organ offer data from the potential transplant recipient dataset, we identified all organ offers for DDKs, including those placed out-of-sequence, along with donor and recipient characteristics. We obtained the prevalence of out-of-sequence allocation and placement in DDKs and assessed temporal trends across organ quality as measured by the kidney donor profile index. Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients measured inequality for out-of-sequence transplantation at the transplant center and OPO levels. Results From 2020 to 2023, out-of-sequence placement of DDKs increased from 328 kidneys in 2020 (2%) to 3470 in 2023 (18%). Out-of-sequence placements now account for greater than one in six DDK transplants and include kidneys across the organ quality spectrum, with 40% of these occurring with kidney donor profile index <50% ( i.e ., the highest quality) kidneys. By 2023, all 55 OPOs were using out-of-sequence allocation, reflected in the Gini coefficient decreasing from 0.88 to 0.43 with no appreciable impact on utilization rates. Conclusions There has been a sharp increase in out-of-sequence allocation of DDKs including high-quality organs. Most of these kidneys are being placed at a small number of transplant centers, creating preferential access to transplantation and exacerbating inequities in access to transplantation.

Clinical Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 21(1)
Colorado School of Public Health (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), Columbia University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
11.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.