Intelligent Systems, Individual Minds: How AI Is Reorganising Learning

This study examines the use of artificial intelligence in education with regard to potentials and limitations. AI changes learning processes through pattern recognition, adaptive control and personalised feedback. Methodologically, the work is based on a literature analysis and case studies from different contexts. The research question focusses on whether AI promotes individual learning when different preferences are taken into account. Two hypotheses were tested. The results show that adaptive systems can increase motivation and performance and stabilise education in crisis situations. Quantitative meta-analyses confirm that learners achieve significantly better results on average in intelligent tutorial environments than in traditional formats. International comparative studies such as the OECD PISA analyses also point to measurable differences in performance in favour of digital learning platforms with AI components. At the same time, the concept of learning types remains scientifically controversial, which is why the second finding is only valid to a limited extent. In addition, ethical and organisational framework conditions are proving to be key factors. International guidelines call for transparency and accountability, while national analyses point to structural inertia. The study makes it clear that AI can modernise education if systems personalise in a targeted manner and thereby improve learning processes. At the same time, it shows that potential can only be realised if ethical standards are in place and institutional structures enable reforms. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Education, Learning Preferences, Adaptive Systems, Ethical Frameworks, Lifelong Learning, Digital Transformation

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Review
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20250943
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intelligent Systems, Individual Minds: How AI Is Reorganising Learning

Enrico Moch, Lars Arnold Ritter
2 citations
International Journal of Research and Review
Online Learning and Analytics
3.39
article

Intelligent Systems, Individual Minds: How AI Is Reorganising Learning

Enrico Moch, Lars Arnold Ritter
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study examines the use of artificial intelligence in education with regard to potentials and limitations. AI changes learning processes through pattern recognition, adaptive control and personalised feedback. Methodologically, the work is based on a literature analysis and case studies from different contexts. The research question focusses on whether AI promotes individual learning when different preferences are taken into account. Two hypotheses were tested. The results show that adaptive systems can increase motivation and performance and stabilise education in crisis situations. Quantitative meta-analyses confirm that learners achieve significantly better results on average in intelligent tutorial environments than in traditional formats. International comparative studies such as the OECD PISA analyses also point to measurable differences in performance in favour of digital learning platforms with AI components. At the same time, the concept of learning types remains scientifically controversial, which is why the second finding is only valid to a limited extent. In addition, ethical and organisational framework conditions are proving to be key factors. International guidelines call for transparency and accountability, while national analyses point to structural inertia. The study makes it clear that AI can modernise education if systems personalise in a targeted manner and thereby improve learning processes. At the same time, it shows that potential can only be realised if ethical standards are in place and institutional structures enable reforms. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Education, Learning Preferences, Adaptive Systems, Ethical Frameworks, Lifelong Learning, Digital Transformation

International Journal of Research and ReviewVol. 12(9)
National Nuclear Security Administration (US), Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Online Learning and Analytics
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.