Cognitive biases in otolaryngology: a systematic narrative review

Cognitive biases are systematic errors in thinking that significantly impact decision-making in surgery, including Otolaryngology. These biases contribute to misdiagnoses, inappropriate treatments and surgical errors, affecting patient outcomes. Despite growing recognition of cognitive biases in medicine, awareness and structured training in cognitive debiasing strategies remain limited. This narrative review systematically examines cognitive biases affecting surgical decision-making in Otolaryngology, categorizes their occurrence in different phases of surgical care and discusses mitigation strategies. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple databases, including MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus, focusing on cognitive biases in surgical fields, particularly Otolaryngology. Studies that explored bias-related diagnostic errors, treatment decisions and mitigation strategies were included. Cognitive biases were classified based on their impact on the diagnostic workup, treatment phase and post-treatment follow-up. A total of 71 cognitive biases were identified as relevant to Otolaryngology. These biases were categorized according to their definitions, sources, examples in Otolaryngology and mitigation strategies. Targeted mitigation strategies, including structured decision-support tools, cognitive forcing strategies and multidisciplinary case discussions, were highlighted. Cognitive biases play a critical role in surgical decision-making in Otolaryngology, often leading to diagnostic and treatment errors. Increased awareness and implementation of cognitive debiasing strategies are essential to improving clinical reasoning and patient outcomes. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of structured interventions and the role of artificial intelligence in mitigating cognitive biases in surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20253002
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive biases in otolaryngology: a systematic narrative review

Davis Thomas Pulimoottil, Irine Thomas, Ajoy Mathew Varghese, Sanu P. Moideen et al.
International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Cognitive biases in otolaryngology: a systematic narrative review

Davis Thomas Pulimoottil, Irine Thomas, Ajoy Mathew Varghese, Sanu P. Moideen, Ramiya Ramachandran Kaipuzha, Deepti Babu, Neenu Anna Joseph, Angel Cham Philip, Hanan Raroth Chalil, Sanghamithra Sethu, Rishana Venkakkunnummal, Gadha Murali, Niveditha Pramod, Dhanya Susan Eapen
article en

Abstract

Cognitive biases are systematic errors in thinking that significantly impact decision-making in surgery, including Otolaryngology. These biases contribute to misdiagnoses, inappropriate treatments and surgical errors, affecting patient outcomes. Despite growing recognition of cognitive biases in medicine, awareness and structured training in cognitive debiasing strategies remain limited. This narrative review systematically examines cognitive biases affecting surgical decision-making in Otolaryngology, categorizes their occurrence in different phases of surgical care and discusses mitigation strategies. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple databases, including MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus, focusing on cognitive biases in surgical fields, particularly Otolaryngology. Studies that explored bias-related diagnostic errors, treatment decisions and mitigation strategies were included. Cognitive biases were classified based on their impact on the diagnostic workup, treatment phase and post-treatment follow-up. A total of 71 cognitive biases were identified as relevant to Otolaryngology. These biases were categorized according to their definitions, sources, examples in Otolaryngology and mitigation strategies. Targeted mitigation strategies, including structured decision-support tools, cognitive forcing strategies and multidisciplinary case discussions, were highlighted. Cognitive biases play a critical role in surgical decision-making in Otolaryngology, often leading to diagnostic and treatment errors. Increased awareness and implementation of cognitive debiasing strategies are essential to improving clinical reasoning and patient outcomes. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of structured interventions and the role of artificial intelligence in mitigating cognitive biases in surgery.

International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck SurgeryVol. 11(5)
Lagos University Teaching Hospital (NG), Jahra Hospital (KW), Nottingham City Hospital (GB), Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (OM), Lagos State Health Service Commission (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.