Epilepsy concordance in monozygotic twins: the role of common genetic variants

Factors underlying discordance for epilepsy in monozygotic twins, in the absence of obvious acquired insults, are incompletely understood. Whilst subtle lesions and postzygotic mutations are sometimes observed, the contribution of common genetic variants remains unexplored. We investigated the role of these variants, measured by polygenic risk scores, in epilepsy concordance. We hypothesized that higher epilepsy polygenic risk scores in concordant monozygotic twins, compared to discordant monozygotic twins and controls, reflect increased epilepsy risk, raising the likelihood of both twins being affected. We calculated epilepsy polygenic risk scores for 102 monozygotic twin pairs (49 concordant, 53 discordant) and 14 632 controls using 2023 epilepsy genome-wide association study summary statistics. Logistic regression, adjusted for sex and principal ancestry components, showed that concordant pairs had significantly higher epilepsy polygenic risk scores than discordant pairs (mean 0.71 versus 0.18; Padj = 0.03) and controls (mean 0.71 versus 0; Padj = 0.001). In contrast, epilepsy polygenic risk scores in discordant pairs did not differ from controls (mean 0.18 versus 0; Padj = 0.38). Our findings suggest that concordance for epilepsy in monozygotic twins is partly driven by common genetic variant burden, underscoring the potential utility of epilepsy polygenic risk scores as predictive markers for epilepsy risk in the general population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf362
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epilepsy concordance in monozygotic twins: the role of common genetic variants

Piero Perucca, Karen Oliver, Samuel F. Berkovic, Melanie Bahlo et al.
Brain
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Epilepsy concordance in monozygotic twins: the role of common genetic variants

Piero Perucca, Karen Oliver, Samuel F. Berkovic, Melanie Bahlo, Yew Li Dang, Kate Esnault
article en

Abstract

Factors underlying discordance for epilepsy in monozygotic twins, in the absence of obvious acquired insults, are incompletely understood. Whilst subtle lesions and postzygotic mutations are sometimes observed, the contribution of common genetic variants remains unexplored. We investigated the role of these variants, measured by polygenic risk scores, in epilepsy concordance. We hypothesized that higher epilepsy polygenic risk scores in concordant monozygotic twins, compared to discordant monozygotic twins and controls, reflect increased epilepsy risk, raising the likelihood of both twins being affected. We calculated epilepsy polygenic risk scores for 102 monozygotic twin pairs (49 concordant, 53 discordant) and 14 632 controls using 2023 epilepsy genome-wide association study summary statistics. Logistic regression, adjusted for sex and principal ancestry components, showed that concordant pairs had significantly higher epilepsy polygenic risk scores than discordant pairs (mean 0.71 versus 0.18; Padj = 0.03) and controls (mean 0.71 versus 0; Padj = 0.001). In contrast, epilepsy polygenic risk scores in discordant pairs did not differ from controls (mean 0.18 versus 0; Padj = 0.38). Our findings suggest that concordance for epilepsy in monozygotic twins is partly driven by common genetic variant burden, underscoring the potential utility of epilepsy polygenic risk scores as predictive markers for epilepsy risk in the general population.

BrainVol. 149(1)
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (AU), Epilepsy Foundation (AU), Alfred Health (AU), Austin Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.