Subset Selection with Curtailment Among Treatments with Two Binary Endpoints in Comparison with a Control

We propose a sequential procedure with a closed and adaptive structure. It selects a subset of size t(>0) from k(≥t) treatments in such a way that any treatment superior to the control is guaranteed to be included. All the experimental treatments and the control are assumed to produce two binary endpoints, and the procedure is based on those two binary endpoints. A treatment is considered superior if both its endpoints are larger than those of the control. While responses across treatments are assumed to be independent, dependence between endpoints within each treatment is allowed and modeled via an odds ratio. The proposed procedure comprises explicit sampling, stopping, and decision rules. We demonstrate that, for any sample size n and parameter configuration, the probability of correct selection remains unchanged when switching from the fixed-sample-size procedure to the sequential one. We use the bivariate binomial and multinomial distributions in the computation and derive design parameters under three scenarios: (i) independent endpoints, (ii) dependent endpoints with known association, and (iii) dependent endpoints with unknown association. We provide tables with the sample size savings achieved by the proposed procedure compared to its fixed-sample-size counterpart. Examples are given to illustrate the procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math13193067
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subset Selection with Curtailment Among Treatments with Two Binary Endpoints in Comparison with a Control

Pinyuen Chen, Elena M. Buzaianu, Lifang Hsu, C.K. Yin
Mathematics
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Subset Selection with Curtailment Among Treatments with Two Binary Endpoints in Comparison with a Control

Pinyuen Chen, Elena M. Buzaianu, Lifang Hsu, C.K. Yin
article en

Abstract

We propose a sequential procedure with a closed and adaptive structure. It selects a subset of size t(>0) from k(≥t) treatments in such a way that any treatment superior to the control is guaranteed to be included. All the experimental treatments and the control are assumed to produce two binary endpoints, and the procedure is based on those two binary endpoints. A treatment is considered superior if both its endpoints are larger than those of the control. While responses across treatments are assumed to be independent, dependence between endpoints within each treatment is allowed and modeled via an odds ratio. The proposed procedure comprises explicit sampling, stopping, and decision rules. We demonstrate that, for any sample size n and parameter configuration, the probability of correct selection remains unchanged when switching from the fixed-sample-size procedure to the sequential one. We use the bivariate binomial and multinomial distributions in the computation and derive design parameters under three scenarios: (i) independent endpoints, (ii) dependent endpoints with known association, and (iii) dependent endpoints with unknown association. We provide tables with the sample size savings achieved by the proposed procedure compared to its fixed-sample-size counterpart. Examples are given to illustrate the procedure.

MathematicsVol. 13(19)
University of North Florida (US), Le Moyne College (US), Syracuse University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.