Normalizing far-right nativist policies: how source-message dissociation and negative immigration news reduce emotional discomfort and increase policy support

Far-right parties are often stigmatized in societies with strong anti-discrimination norms, yet their exclusionary nativist policies can attract broad public support. Drawing on minority influence theory, this research examined whether such support increases when nativist policies are dissociated from far-right parties and presented in a media context shaped by negative immigration news. Across five experiments in Switzerland (N = 1,423), participants evaluated a nativist policy either associated or not with a far-right party, following exposure to positive or neutral/negative immigration news. Results showed that dissociating the policy from the far right reduced emotional discomfort and increased support—particularly under neutral or negative news conditions, but not under positive news. These findings suggest that negative immigration news helps normalize nativist policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Influence
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2025.2552682
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normalizing far-right nativist policies: how source-message dissociation and negative immigration news reduce emotional discomfort and increase policy support

Eva G. T. Green, Juan Manuel Falomir‐Pichastor, Matthieu Vétois, Christopher Geisser
1 citations
Social Influence
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
8.52
article

Normalizing far-right nativist policies: how source-message dissociation and negative immigration news reduce emotional discomfort and increase policy support

Eva G. T. Green, Juan Manuel Falomir‐Pichastor, Matthieu Vétois, Christopher Geisser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Far-right parties are often stigmatized in societies with strong anti-discrimination norms, yet their exclusionary nativist policies can attract broad public support. Drawing on minority influence theory, this research examined whether such support increases when nativist policies are dissociated from far-right parties and presented in a media context shaped by negative immigration news. Across five experiments in Switzerland (N = 1,423), participants evaluated a nativist policy either associated or not with a far-right party, following exposure to positive or neutral/negative immigration news. Results showed that dissociating the policy from the far right reduced emotional discomfort and increased support—particularly under neutral or negative news conditions, but not under positive news. These findings suggest that negative immigration news helps normalize nativist policies.

Social InfluenceVol. 20(1)
University of Geneva (CH), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology (CZ), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.