Maximizing inference from distributed experimental networks via “add‐on” studies

Distributed experimental networks have emerged as a powerful approach in field ecology, enabling experimental replication across global gradients. These networks use standardized treatments at dispersed sites to identify factors like climate or soil that shape biotic responses. Reserving space for future “add‐on” work fosters discovery by transforming distributed networks into distributed experimental infrastructure. However, challenges include balancing feasibility, plot impacts, and demands on site scientists. Using the Disturbance and Recovery Across Grasslands Network (DRAGNet) as a case study informed by lessons learned in the Nutrient Network (NutNet), we outline effective practices for designing add‐on work to retain the original experiment’s integrity while effectively using the resources of the network participants. By following guidelines for hypothesis‐driven, inclusive research that engages contributors intellectually, minimizes plot impacts using field‐tested protocols, and maximizes scientific impact and inclusion, distributed networks can become valuable infrastructure for advancing ecological understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70007
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maximizing inference from distributed experimental networks via “add‐on” studies

Elizabeth T. Borer, Eric W. Seabloom
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Scientific Computing and Data Management
article

Maximizing inference from distributed experimental networks via “add‐on” studies

Elizabeth T. Borer, Eric W. Seabloom
article en

Abstract

Distributed experimental networks have emerged as a powerful approach in field ecology, enabling experimental replication across global gradients. These networks use standardized treatments at dispersed sites to identify factors like climate or soil that shape biotic responses. Reserving space for future “add‐on” work fosters discovery by transforming distributed networks into distributed experimental infrastructure. However, challenges include balancing feasibility, plot impacts, and demands on site scientists. Using the Disturbance and Recovery Across Grasslands Network (DRAGNet) as a case study informed by lessons learned in the Nutrient Network (NutNet), we outline effective practices for designing add‐on work to retain the original experiment’s integrity while effectively using the resources of the network participants. By following guidelines for hypothesis‐driven, inclusive research that engages contributors intellectually, minimizes plot impacts using field‐tested protocols, and maximizes scientific impact and inclusion, distributed networks can become valuable infrastructure for advancing ecological understanding.

Frontiers in Ecology and the EnvironmentVol. 23(10)
University of Minnesota (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Minnesota
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Maximizing inference from distributed experimental networks via “add‐on” studies — Elizabeth T. Borer, Eric W. Seabloom · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS