Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Salvage Radiotherapy in Post-Radical Prostatectomy Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Current Evidence

Background/Objectives: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in 15–40% of men within five years of radical prostatectomy (RP), presenting a major challenge for long-term disease control. While salvage radiotherapy (SRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are established post-RP interventions, the optimal integration of ADT with SRT—regarding timing, duration, and patient selection—remains unclear. We aimed to synthesize current clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of combining ADT with SRT in patients experiencing BCR after RP. Methods: A narrative review was conducted, encompassing retrospective cohort studies, prospective randomized controlled trials (notably RTOG 9601, GETUG-AFU 16, RADICALS-HD, and SPPORT), and meta-analyses. Studies were selected based on relevance to combined ADT + SRT versus SRT alone, with outcomes of interest including biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Trial characteristics, ADT duration (short-term [4–6 months] versus long-term [≥24 months]), radiation scheme, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) thresholds at SRT initiation were extracted and compared. Results: The combination of ADT and SRT represents a promising strategy for the treatment of prostate cancer with BCR after RP. Current evidence supports its benefit in terms of disease control and survival, particularly in high-risk patients. Conclusions: Differences in inclusion criteria, ADT duration, and the heterogeneous quality of the available studies limit the formulation of universal recommendations. Well-designed prospective trials are needed to optimize therapeutic approaches and personalize treatment based on each patient’s risk profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Therapeutics
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/therapeutics2040016
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Salvage Radiotherapy in Post-Radical Prostatectomy Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Current Evidence

A. Lazo, Rocío del Castillo-Acuña, Manuel Luis Blanco-Villar, Jonathan Saavedra-Bejarano et al.
Therapeutics
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Salvage Radiotherapy in Post-Radical Prostatectomy Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Current Evidence

A. Lazo, Rocío del Castillo-Acuña, Manuel Luis Blanco-Villar, Jonathan Saavedra-Bejarano, Paula Simón-Silva, Angeles Sanchez-Galvez
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in 15–40% of men within five years of radical prostatectomy (RP), presenting a major challenge for long-term disease control. While salvage radiotherapy (SRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are established post-RP interventions, the optimal integration of ADT with SRT—regarding timing, duration, and patient selection—remains unclear. We aimed to synthesize current clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of combining ADT with SRT in patients experiencing BCR after RP. Methods: A narrative review was conducted, encompassing retrospective cohort studies, prospective randomized controlled trials (notably RTOG 9601, GETUG-AFU 16, RADICALS-HD, and SPPORT), and meta-analyses. Studies were selected based on relevance to combined ADT + SRT versus SRT alone, with outcomes of interest including biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Trial characteristics, ADT duration (short-term [4–6 months] versus long-term [≥24 months]), radiation scheme, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) thresholds at SRT initiation were extracted and compared. Results: The combination of ADT and SRT represents a promising strategy for the treatment of prostate cancer with BCR after RP. Current evidence supports its benefit in terms of disease control and survival, particularly in high-risk patients. Conclusions: Differences in inclusion criteria, ADT duration, and the heterogeneous quality of the available studies limit the formulation of universal recommendations. Well-designed prospective trials are needed to optimize therapeutic approaches and personalize treatment based on each patient’s risk profile.

TherapeuticsVol. 2(4)
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves (ES), Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén (ES), Complejo Hospitalario Torrecárdenas (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria (ES), GEICAM – Spanish Breast Cancer Group (ES), Junta de Andalucía (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.