Uncertainty Quantification and The Need for Better Understanding of Monte Carlo and Random Number Generation

Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is critical in scientific modeling and decision making, addressing the inherent uncertainty and lack of precision in computational modeling. Monte Carlo methods, one of the two prominent approaches in UQ, rely on random number generation to simulate complex systems and estimate probability density functions. However, the quality of these methods is naturally tied to the integrity of the random numbers used. Poorly designed random number generators (RNGs) can lead to biased or unreliable results, undermining the validity of UQ. Despite advancements in RNG algorithms, challenges remain in balancing computational efficiency, reproducibility, and randomness quality. A deeper understanding of these generators, their limitations, and their integration with Monte Carlo methods is essential to advancing UQ practices. This technical report tries to highlight keywords in the random number generation field and give a couple of examples showcasing the pitfalls.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58895/ksp/1000179597-2
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty Quantification and The Need for Better Understanding of Monte Carlo and Random Number Generation

Ali Darijani
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
article

Uncertainty Quantification and The Need for Better Understanding of Monte Carlo and Random Number Generation

Ali Darijani
article en

Abstract

Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is critical in scientific modeling and decision making, addressing the inherent uncertainty and lack of precision in computational modeling. Monte Carlo methods, one of the two prominent approaches in UQ, rely on random number generation to simulate complex systems and estimate probability density functions. However, the quality of these methods is naturally tied to the integrity of the random numbers used. Poorly designed random number generators (RNGs) can lead to biased or unreliable results, undermining the validity of UQ. Despite advancements in RNG algorithms, challenges remain in balancing computational efficiency, reproducibility, and randomness quality. A deeper understanding of these generators, their limitations, and their integration with Monte Carlo methods is essential to advancing UQ practices. This technical report tries to highlight keywords in the random number generation field and give a couple of examples showcasing the pitfalls.

Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.