The Regulation of Third‐Party Verification Entities in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Schemes: Lessons From China

ABSTRACT Greenhouse gas emissions trading schemes worldwide broadly adopt third‐party verification, introducing private actors into public climate governance. However, the involvement of third‐party verifiers can create the risk that no accurate and reliable data concerning emissions is acquired, and this potentially harms the proper implementation of emissions trading schemes. This paper explores why the intervention of third‐party verifiers in emissions trading schemes requires regulation and addresses the regulatory tools for controlling verifiers. To illustrate the need to regulate verifiers, China's emissions trading schemes are discussed. It is argued that the regulation of third‐party verification in China's emissions trading schemes is justified by potential concerns about the independence of verifiers. Moreover, adverse selection and moral hazard may arise. This paper also analyzes the extent to which China's emissions trading scheme regulations for third‐party verifiers conform to the economic theories of regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70085
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Regulation of Third‐Party Verification Entities in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Schemes: Lessons From China

Michaël Faure, Ying Xie
Regulation & Governance
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

The Regulation of Third‐Party Verification Entities in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Schemes: Lessons From China

Michaël Faure, Ying Xie
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Greenhouse gas emissions trading schemes worldwide broadly adopt third‐party verification, introducing private actors into public climate governance. However, the involvement of third‐party verifiers can create the risk that no accurate and reliable data concerning emissions is acquired, and this potentially harms the proper implementation of emissions trading schemes. This paper explores why the intervention of third‐party verifiers in emissions trading schemes requires regulation and addresses the regulatory tools for controlling verifiers. To illustrate the need to regulate verifiers, China's emissions trading schemes are discussed. It is argued that the regulation of third‐party verification in China's emissions trading schemes is justified by potential concerns about the independence of verifiers. Moreover, adverse selection and moral hazard may arise. This paper also analyzes the extent to which China's emissions trading scheme regulations for third‐party verifiers conform to the economic theories of regulation.

Regulation & GovernanceVol. 20(1)
University of Indonesia (ID), Maastricht University (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Universiteit Maastricht, China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.