The modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance (mCTSIB) performed on the Wii balance board: A validity study

Introduction Although often classified as a motor skill, standing balance relies on three sensory systems: vestibular, proprioception, and visual. To assess balance by challenging these systems, the rater uses the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance (mCTSIB). However, valid low-cost equipment is unavailable for continuous patient monitoring. Objective The aim of the present study was to assess the validity of the Wii balance board (WBB) compared to a standard force platform during the mCTSIB. Methods A sample of 50 participants (17 men and 33 women; 23.34 [3.10] y; 1.68 [0.08] m; 68.82 [13.55] kg) was included. The average total COP displacement was simultaneously collected during standing balance from both WBB and the force platform under four conditions: eyes opened and closed with and without a foam cushion. Results No significant differences were observed between the WBB and the force platform. The correlation was considered high (r > .98; p = .001), with excellent adjusted coefficients of determination (.97 < r 2 < .99). The Bland–Altman method revealed low bias, and the majority of the results were scattered between the lower and upper levels of agreement. Conclusions The present findings suggest the validity of the WBB to assess the balance during the mCTSIB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology and Disability
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10554181251381936
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance (mCTSIB) performed on the Wii balance board: A validity study

Alexandre Carvalho Barbosa, Mariana Alves de Oliveira, Kariny Realino Ferreira, Maria Eduarda Higino Schuhmacher et al.
Technology and Disability
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

The modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance (mCTSIB) performed on the Wii balance board: A validity study

Alexandre Carvalho Barbosa, Mariana Alves de Oliveira, Kariny Realino Ferreira, Maria Eduarda Higino Schuhmacher, Michelle Almeida Barbosa, Maria de Cássia Macedo, Raíssa Sthefanie Henrique Mattedi
article en

Abstract

Introduction Although often classified as a motor skill, standing balance relies on three sensory systems: vestibular, proprioception, and visual. To assess balance by challenging these systems, the rater uses the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance (mCTSIB). However, valid low-cost equipment is unavailable for continuous patient monitoring. Objective The aim of the present study was to assess the validity of the Wii balance board (WBB) compared to a standard force platform during the mCTSIB. Methods A sample of 50 participants (17 men and 33 women; 23.34 [3.10] y; 1.68 [0.08] m; 68.82 [13.55] kg) was included. The average total COP displacement was simultaneously collected during standing balance from both WBB and the force platform under four conditions: eyes opened and closed with and without a foam cushion. Results No significant differences were observed between the WBB and the force platform. The correlation was considered high (r > .98; p = .001), with excellent adjusted coefficients of determination (.97 < r 2 < .99). The Bland–Altman method revealed low bias, and the majority of the results were scattered between the lower and upper levels of agreement. Conclusions The present findings suggest the validity of the WBB to assess the balance during the mCTSIB.

Technology and Disability
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.