Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Bypass Surgery: Evidence and Implications for Personalized Care

<b>Objectives:</b> Sternal wound infections (SWIs) after cardiac surgery remain a major complication and represent a significant clinical challenge. This article aims to evaluate the effectiveness of closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) in preventing postoperative wound complications in high-risk patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery via full median sternotomy. <b>Methods</b>: Data on all consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery at our facility between March 2021 and March 2023 were retrospectively collected. The ciNPWT group consisted of 71 patients. A control group receiving conventional wound dressings was selected by propensity matching. The primary outcome was postoperative sternal wound complication of any severity, as well as superficial and deep SWIs. The secondary outcomes were hospital stay length, in-hospital mortality, and need for perioperative wound revision. <b>Results</b>: The incidence of postoperative SWIs was significantly higher in the ciNPWT group than in the control group (18 [25.4%] vs. 7 [9.9%], <i>p</i> = 0.03). Of these 25 cases, 20 had received postoperative ciNPWT and 5 conventional wound dressings, which was statistically different (15 [21.1%] vs. 5 [7.0%], <i>p</i> = 0.03). ciNPWT was also significantly associated with positive bacterial cultures (13 [18.3%] vs. 4 [5.6%], <i>p</i> = 0.04) and perioperative wound revision (11 [15.5%] vs. 6 [8.5%], <i>p</i> = 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: In consecutive high-risk patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery, the use of prophylactic ciNPWT did not improve wound healing compared to conventional wound dressings, raising concerns about its effectiveness in high-risk patients. Our results do not support the routine use of ciNPWT in this setting. Its potential value may instead lie in carefully defined patient subgroups, underscoring the relevance of our findings for patient-tailored care strategies in cardiac surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15100448
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Bypass Surgery: Evidence and Implications for Personalized Care

Manuel Wilbring, Verónica De Angelis, Ali Taghizadeh‐Waghefi, Utz Kappert et al.
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Surgical site infection prevention
article

Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Bypass Surgery: Evidence and Implications for Personalized Care

Manuel Wilbring, Verónica De Angelis, Ali Taghizadeh‐Waghefi, Utz Kappert, Konstantin Alexiou, Klaus Matschke, Asen Petrov, Stanislaw Vander Zwaag, Taofeq Bastouni
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> Sternal wound infections (SWIs) after cardiac surgery remain a major complication and represent a significant clinical challenge. This article aims to evaluate the effectiveness of closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) in preventing postoperative wound complications in high-risk patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery via full median sternotomy. <b>Methods</b>: Data on all consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery at our facility between March 2021 and March 2023 were retrospectively collected. The ciNPWT group consisted of 71 patients. A control group receiving conventional wound dressings was selected by propensity matching. The primary outcome was postoperative sternal wound complication of any severity, as well as superficial and deep SWIs. The secondary outcomes were hospital stay length, in-hospital mortality, and need for perioperative wound revision. <b>Results</b>: The incidence of postoperative SWIs was significantly higher in the ciNPWT group than in the control group (18 [25.4%] vs. 7 [9.9%], <i>p</i> = 0.03). Of these 25 cases, 20 had received postoperative ciNPWT and 5 conventional wound dressings, which was statistically different (15 [21.1%] vs. 5 [7.0%], <i>p</i> = 0.03). ciNPWT was also significantly associated with positive bacterial cultures (13 [18.3%] vs. 4 [5.6%], <i>p</i> = 0.04) and perioperative wound revision (11 [15.5%] vs. 6 [8.5%], <i>p</i> = 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: In consecutive high-risk patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery, the use of prophylactic ciNPWT did not improve wound healing compared to conventional wound dressings, raising concerns about its effectiveness in high-risk patients. Our results do not support the routine use of ciNPWT in this setting. Its potential value may instead lie in carefully defined patient subgroups, underscoring the relevance of our findings for patient-tailored care strategies in cardiac surgery.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 15(10)
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.