Analysis of Spatial Evolution of Inclusive Finance at the County Level: A Comparative Study of Traditional and Digital Finance

ABSTRACT In light of the increasing relevance of inclusive finance in reducing economic inequality, this study explores the developmental patterns of both traditional and digital inclusive finance at the county level within China. Utilising panel data from 1867 counties from 2014 to 2020, alongside the ‘Peking University Digital Financial Inclusion Index’, the paper examines the progression of these two forms of finance. By applying the Thiel index model and spatial econometric model, the research analyses the convergence and divergence between traditional and digital inclusive finance. The findings reveal: (1) Between 2014 and 2020, both traditional and digital inclusive finance experienced notable growth. The digital finance index surged by 147.64% at its median, surpassing the 71.21% growth of traditional finance. Nevertheless, a regional imbalance persists, with eastern areas showing more advancement than western ones. (2) Over 70% of regional disparities are attributed to factors within provinces. While digital inclusive finance saw fast convergence until 2016, its pace decelerated sharply thereafter. (3) Significant spatial clustering and correlation are observed in county‐level inclusive finance. In 2020, Moran's I index for digital finance was 0.215, indicating stronger spatial interdependence compared to traditional finance. Convergence is notably quicker in the western regions and poorer counties, with rates of 0.195 for traditional finance and 0.161 for digital finance in these areas. This study stands out by offering a detailed comparison of the spatial evolution and convergence of both types of inclusive finance, with particular attention to the influence of neighbouring regions. This approach sheds light on the spatial and temporal dynamics of financial inclusion in China, providing key insights for policymakers aiming to foster balanced regional growth and improve financial inclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70063
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Spatial Evolution of Inclusive Finance at the County Level: A Comparative Study of Traditional and Digital Finance

Qiaoling Fu, X.Y. Zhang, Ying Zhang, Zeyun Yang
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
article

Analysis of Spatial Evolution of Inclusive Finance at the County Level: A Comparative Study of Traditional and Digital Finance

Qiaoling Fu, X.Y. Zhang, Ying Zhang, Zeyun Yang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In light of the increasing relevance of inclusive finance in reducing economic inequality, this study explores the developmental patterns of both traditional and digital inclusive finance at the county level within China. Utilising panel data from 1867 counties from 2014 to 2020, alongside the ‘Peking University Digital Financial Inclusion Index’, the paper examines the progression of these two forms of finance. By applying the Thiel index model and spatial econometric model, the research analyses the convergence and divergence between traditional and digital inclusive finance. The findings reveal: (1) Between 2014 and 2020, both traditional and digital inclusive finance experienced notable growth. The digital finance index surged by 147.64% at its median, surpassing the 71.21% growth of traditional finance. Nevertheless, a regional imbalance persists, with eastern areas showing more advancement than western ones. (2) Over 70% of regional disparities are attributed to factors within provinces. While digital inclusive finance saw fast convergence until 2016, its pace decelerated sharply thereafter. (3) Significant spatial clustering and correlation are observed in county‐level inclusive finance. In 2020, Moran's I index for digital finance was 0.215, indicating stronger spatial interdependence compared to traditional finance. Convergence is notably quicker in the western regions and poorer counties, with rates of 0.195 for traditional finance and 0.161 for digital finance in these areas. This study stands out by offering a detailed comparison of the spatial evolution and convergence of both types of inclusive finance, with particular attention to the influence of neighbouring regions. This approach sheds light on the spatial and temporal dynamics of financial inclusion in China, providing key insights for policymakers aiming to foster balanced regional growth and improve financial inclusion.

International Journal of Finance & Economics
Beijing Union University (CN), China University of Political Science and Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.