Valuing Ecosystem Services in the Ecuadorian Amazon: Strategic Applications of ESVD-Based Benefit Transfer for Conservation Finance

This paper demonstrates how ecosystem service valuation can inform conservation finance strategies using the Benefit Transfer Method (BTM) and internationally recognized valuation databases. We apply the Ecosystem Services Valuation Database (ESVD) to estimate the economic value of services provided by a 60-hectare property in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Using BTM, we compare Net Present Value outcomes across three scenarios: Carbon Sequestration Only, Extractive Use, and Full Ecosystem Services. Results show that the full valuation scenario—i.e. the “True Economic Value” (TEV)—far exceeds the outcomes in both the carbon-only and extractive-use cases. By year 100, this value is 4.8 times greater than extractive use and 3.1 times greater than carbon-only, underscoring the long-term importance of intact ecosystems. We then examine financing pathways, including payments for ecosystem services (PES), biodiversity credits, conservation easements, and REDD+, and propose investment structuring options informed by ESVD-derived valuation. Drawing on recent developments, we argue for diversified, multi-service approaches that more fully capture the ecological and economic value of tropical forests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Business and Economics
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v27i5.7848
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Valuing Ecosystem Services in the Ecuadorian Amazon: Strategic Applications of ESVD-Based Benefit Transfer for Conservation Finance

Giles Jackson, Musa Mulyadi, Jason Doedderlein
Journal of Applied Business and Economics
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Valuing Ecosystem Services in the Ecuadorian Amazon: Strategic Applications of ESVD-Based Benefit Transfer for Conservation Finance

Giles Jackson, Musa Mulyadi, Jason Doedderlein
article en

Abstract

This paper demonstrates how ecosystem service valuation can inform conservation finance strategies using the Benefit Transfer Method (BTM) and internationally recognized valuation databases. We apply the Ecosystem Services Valuation Database (ESVD) to estimate the economic value of services provided by a 60-hectare property in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Using BTM, we compare Net Present Value outcomes across three scenarios: Carbon Sequestration Only, Extractive Use, and Full Ecosystem Services. Results show that the full valuation scenario—i.e. the “True Economic Value” (TEV)—far exceeds the outcomes in both the carbon-only and extractive-use cases. By year 100, this value is 4.8 times greater than extractive use and 3.1 times greater than carbon-only, underscoring the long-term importance of intact ecosystems. We then examine financing pathways, including payments for ecosystem services (PES), biodiversity credits, conservation easements, and REDD+, and propose investment structuring options informed by ESVD-derived valuation. Drawing on recent developments, we argue for diversified, multi-service approaches that more fully capture the ecological and economic value of tropical forests.

Journal of Applied Business and EconomicsVol. 27(5)
Tsuru University (JP), Shenandoah University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.