The Cost of Complying With U.S. GAAP and Cross-Listed Firms’ Valuations

The study examines the capital market consequences of foreign firms’ cost of complying with U.S. GAAP. It builds upon a prior research that explores the effect of foreign firms’ U.S. GAAP compliance cost on their cross-listing decisions and listing choices (Lin 2011). Two cost constructs established at the firm level, reconciliation and disclosure, are adopted as proxy for firms’ compliance cost. The valuation analyses confirm the existence of cross-listing and exchange-listing premium. Although individual firms’ reconciliation costs play a little role in valuation, disclosure costs are found to negatively affect the value of cross-listed firms, i.e., firms with less disclosure of accounting information than what U.S. rules require, thus incurring higher disclosure costs, are valued less by the market. This result holds even after the strength of home country disclosure regime is considered. This study extends prior research by investigating the role of firm-specific compliance costs on valuation and provides new evidence on the source of the cross-listing premium.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Business and Economics
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v27i5.7852
Primary Topic
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Cost of Complying With U.S. GAAP and Cross-Listed Firms’ Valuations

Jing Lin
Journal of Applied Business and Economics
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
article

The Cost of Complying With U.S. GAAP and Cross-Listed Firms’ Valuations

Jing Lin
article en

Abstract

The study examines the capital market consequences of foreign firms’ cost of complying with U.S. GAAP. It builds upon a prior research that explores the effect of foreign firms’ U.S. GAAP compliance cost on their cross-listing decisions and listing choices (Lin 2011). Two cost constructs established at the firm level, reconciliation and disclosure, are adopted as proxy for firms’ compliance cost. The valuation analyses confirm the existence of cross-listing and exchange-listing premium. Although individual firms’ reconciliation costs play a little role in valuation, disclosure costs are found to negatively affect the value of cross-listed firms, i.e., firms with less disclosure of accounting information than what U.S. rules require, thus incurring higher disclosure costs, are valued less by the market. This result holds even after the strength of home country disclosure regime is considered. This study extends prior research by investigating the role of firm-specific compliance costs on valuation and provides new evidence on the source of the cross-listing premium.

Journal of Applied Business and EconomicsVol. 27(5)
Saint Joseph's University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.