The Executorial Nature of Fiduciary Guarantee Certificates as Equivalent to Final and Binding Court Decisions

In the fiduciary guarantee certificate, the phrase “For the Sake of Justice Based on God Almighty” is included, which grants it the same executorial power as a court decision with permanent legal force, as regulated in Article 15 of Law Number 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Guarantees. This study examines three main problems: first, the function of the principles of publicity and speciality in fiduciary guarantee registration; second, the legal force of the fiduciary guarantee certificate; and third, its position as the basis for execution of fiduciary guarantee objects. The research adopts a doctrinal method aimed at systematically explaining legal rules, analyzing interrelations among them, clarifying obscure aspects, and predicting future developments. The approach combines statutory, conceptual, and historical perspectives, employing both primary and secondary legal materials, alongside non-legal references, analyzed through a deductive-qualitative method. The principle of publicity functions to ensure accessibility in identifying fiduciary objects, while the principle of speciality provides legal certainty to fiduciary recipients. However, the fiduciary guarantee certificate is issued by the Ministry of Law, which does not possess the authority to grant executorial power. Therefore, from a theoretical standpoint, the fiduciary guarantee certificate should not equate to a court decision with permanent legal force but rather serve merely as proof of registration containing the statement “For the Sake of Justice Based on God Almighty.” This reveals a normative contradiction between statutory regulation and the practical interpretation of the certificate’s legal force”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
rechtenstudent
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35719/rch.v5i3.365
Primary Topic
Legal principles and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Executorial Nature of Fiduciary Guarantee Certificates as Equivalent to Final and Binding Court Decisions

Ahmad Badawi, Nikmatul Keumala Nofa Yuwono
rechtenstudent
Legal principles and applications
article

The Executorial Nature of Fiduciary Guarantee Certificates as Equivalent to Final and Binding Court Decisions

Ahmad Badawi, Nikmatul Keumala Nofa Yuwono
article en

Abstract

In the fiduciary guarantee certificate, the phrase “For the Sake of Justice Based on God Almighty” is included, which grants it the same executorial power as a court decision with permanent legal force, as regulated in Article 15 of Law Number 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Guarantees. This study examines three main problems: first, the function of the principles of publicity and speciality in fiduciary guarantee registration; second, the legal force of the fiduciary guarantee certificate; and third, its position as the basis for execution of fiduciary guarantee objects. The research adopts a doctrinal method aimed at systematically explaining legal rules, analyzing interrelations among them, clarifying obscure aspects, and predicting future developments. The approach combines statutory, conceptual, and historical perspectives, employing both primary and secondary legal materials, alongside non-legal references, analyzed through a deductive-qualitative method. The principle of publicity functions to ensure accessibility in identifying fiduciary objects, while the principle of speciality provides legal certainty to fiduciary recipients. However, the fiduciary guarantee certificate is issued by the Ministry of Law, which does not possess the authority to grant executorial power. Therefore, from a theoretical standpoint, the fiduciary guarantee certificate should not equate to a court decision with permanent legal force but rather serve merely as proof of registration containing the statement “For the Sake of Justice Based on God Almighty.” This reveals a normative contradiction between statutory regulation and the practical interpretation of the certificate’s legal force”.

rechtenstudentVol. 5(3)
University of August 17, 1945 Banyuwangi (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Legal principles and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Executorial Nature of Fiduciary Guarantee Certificates as Equivalent to Final and Binding Court Decisions — Ahmad Badawi, Nikmatul Keumala Nofa Yuwono · rechtenstudent (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS