The dual role of liquidity creation in bank default risk: evidence form North Africa

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between liquidity creation (LC) and bank default risk and whether the level of LC matters in shaping this relationship. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on a sample of 46 North African banks for the period extending from 2006 to 2022. To investigate the potential nonlinear relationship, we adopt a dynamic panel threshold method. Findings The results reveal that the relationship between LC and default risk is nonlinear and depends on the level of LC. More precisely, we find that below the threshold value, the relationship is found to be negative and it turns to be positive once we surpass the threshold value of LC. Originality/value This paper gives a more complete and detailed image on the relationship between LC and default risk using a nonlinear methodology, which extends to the current literature’s insight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Economic and Management Studies
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ajems-02-2025-0135
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The dual role of liquidity creation in bank default risk: evidence form North Africa

Sedki Zaiane
African Journal of Economic and Management Studies
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

The dual role of liquidity creation in bank default risk: evidence form North Africa

Sedki Zaiane
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between liquidity creation (LC) and bank default risk and whether the level of LC matters in shaping this relationship. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on a sample of 46 North African banks for the period extending from 2006 to 2022. To investigate the potential nonlinear relationship, we adopt a dynamic panel threshold method. Findings The results reveal that the relationship between LC and default risk is nonlinear and depends on the level of LC. More precisely, we find that below the threshold value, the relationship is found to be negative and it turns to be positive once we surpass the threshold value of LC. Originality/value This paper gives a more complete and detailed image on the relationship between LC and default risk using a nonlinear methodology, which extends to the current literature’s insight.

African Journal of Economic and Management StudiesVol. 16(4)
Bank of Italy (IT), National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Moscow Banking Institute (RU), Moscow School of Social and Economic Sciences (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.