Research on the influence mechanism of food packaging on consumers' behavioral intention to refuse food waste based on behavioral reasoning theory

Given the escalating global concern regarding food waste, food packaging emerges as a critical area for intervention. Existing research, however, predominantly concentrates on consumer attitudes, offering limited insight into the role of food packaging in mitigating food waste. To address this gap, this study employs the BRT model, incorporating the variable of behavioral rationality into traditional theory and integrating values as a preceding variable. It integrates consumer values, behavioral rationality, attitudes, and behavioral intentions to explore the influence mechanism of food packaging on consumer behavior, explaining behavioral intentions through supporting/rejecting reasons. The study investigates how visual attributes, functionality, environmental sustainability, and social attributes within supporting reasons positively influence consumers' attitudes and behavioral intentions to reject food waste. Conversely, it investigates how information overload, functional deficiencies, inappropriate sizing, and high cognitive load within rejection reasons negatively impact these attitudes and intentions. By dissecting the positive and negative impacts of food packaging attributes on consumer attitudes and behavioral intentions across supporting and rejecting reasons, this research aims to identify key design factors for food packaging. This will fill existing research gaps, provide a theoretical foundation for food packaging design, and encourage consumers to adopt positive behaviors that reduce food waste. The findings indicate that: (1) consumer values significantly influence different behavioral attitudes; (2) supporting reasons related to food packaging positively impact the rejection of food waste behavior, while rejecting reasons have the opposite effect; (3) both positive and negative reasons significantly influence consumer attitudes and behavioral intentions, highlighting the need to optimize design elements in food packaging to positively influence consumer behavior; (4) packaging design factors have a more significant impact on intentions to conserve food than consumer attitudes themselves. This study extends the Behavioral Reasoning Theory (BRT) to understand food packaging's influence on consumer behavior, addressing contextual factors within BRT. Furthermore, it provides a scientific basis for food companies to optimize packaging design, which has practical implications for mitigating global food waste.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1630861
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the influence mechanism of food packaging on consumers' behavioral intention to refuse food waste based on behavioral reasoning theory

Linglin Zhou, Juncheng Mu, Chun Yang
Frontiers in Psychology
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
article

Research on the influence mechanism of food packaging on consumers' behavioral intention to refuse food waste based on behavioral reasoning theory

Linglin Zhou, Juncheng Mu, Chun Yang
article en

Abstract

Given the escalating global concern regarding food waste, food packaging emerges as a critical area for intervention. Existing research, however, predominantly concentrates on consumer attitudes, offering limited insight into the role of food packaging in mitigating food waste. To address this gap, this study employs the BRT model, incorporating the variable of behavioral rationality into traditional theory and integrating values as a preceding variable. It integrates consumer values, behavioral rationality, attitudes, and behavioral intentions to explore the influence mechanism of food packaging on consumer behavior, explaining behavioral intentions through supporting/rejecting reasons. The study investigates how visual attributes, functionality, environmental sustainability, and social attributes within supporting reasons positively influence consumers' attitudes and behavioral intentions to reject food waste. Conversely, it investigates how information overload, functional deficiencies, inappropriate sizing, and high cognitive load within rejection reasons negatively impact these attitudes and intentions. By dissecting the positive and negative impacts of food packaging attributes on consumer attitudes and behavioral intentions across supporting and rejecting reasons, this research aims to identify key design factors for food packaging. This will fill existing research gaps, provide a theoretical foundation for food packaging design, and encourage consumers to adopt positive behaviors that reduce food waste. The findings indicate that: (1) consumer values significantly influence different behavioral attitudes; (2) supporting reasons related to food packaging positively impact the rejection of food waste behavior, while rejecting reasons have the opposite effect; (3) both positive and negative reasons significantly influence consumer attitudes and behavioral intentions, highlighting the need to optimize design elements in food packaging to positively influence consumer behavior; (4) packaging design factors have a more significant impact on intentions to conserve food than consumer attitudes themselves. This study extends the Behavioral Reasoning Theory (BRT) to understand food packaging's influence on consumer behavior, addressing contextual factors within BRT. Furthermore, it provides a scientific basis for food companies to optimize packaging design, which has practical implications for mitigating global food waste.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
Jiangnan University (CN), Nanjing Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.