Navigating the nuances of studying animal facial behaviors with Facial Action Coding Systems

Facial Action Coding Systems (FACS) are some of the most systematic and standardized methods for studying the physical aspects of animal facial behavior. Although FACS manuals provide some guidance on how to implement their coding system, they often lack detailed recommendations for data collection protocols, which impacts the types of data that can be coded. Furthermore, there are various methods for data coding that are not always discussed in FACS. In this perspective piece, I aim to review some considerations related to the data collection and coding process and to offer best practice recommendations, as well as alternatives. While this list of considerations and recommendations is not comprehensive, I hope it encourages more discussions and the sharing of additional guidelines and protocols for FACS. By doing this, we can enhance the systematic approach and scientific rigor of FACS further.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ethology
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fetho.2025.1686756
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the nuances of studying animal facial behaviors with Facial Action Coding Systems

Brittany N. Florkiewicz
2 citations
Frontiers in Ethology
Face Recognition and Perception
2.86
article

Navigating the nuances of studying animal facial behaviors with Facial Action Coding Systems

Brittany N. Florkiewicz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Facial Action Coding Systems (FACS) are some of the most systematic and standardized methods for studying the physical aspects of animal facial behavior. Although FACS manuals provide some guidance on how to implement their coding system, they often lack detailed recommendations for data collection protocols, which impacts the types of data that can be coded. Furthermore, there are various methods for data coding that are not always discussed in FACS. In this perspective piece, I aim to review some considerations related to the data collection and coding process and to offer best practice recommendations, as well as alternatives. While this list of considerations and recommendations is not comprehensive, I hope it encourages more discussions and the sharing of additional guidelines and protocols for FACS. By doing this, we can enhance the systematic approach and scientific rigor of FACS further.

Frontiers in EthologyVol. 4
Lyon College (US), Missouri College (US), University of Arkansas Community College at Batesville (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Face Recognition and Perception
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating the nuances of studying animal facial behaviors with Facial Action Coding Systems — Brittany N. Florkiewicz · Frontiers in Ethology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS