Pandemic transmission forecasting: insights from COVID-19 modeling involving environmental factors

Numerous mathematical models use various predictors and modeling approaches to forecast pandemics; however, given the diversity of these models, it remains unclear which type offers the most advantage. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the accuracy of models that incorporate natural, social, and pollution-related environmental factors to predict COVID-19 transmission, and to explore the potential role of predictive models in managing future large-scale epidemics. The results revealed that, although only six studies used mathematical models with both natural and social environmental predictors, these models outperformed those with only natural or pollution predictors. Currently, most models focus primarily on temperature and humidity, with limited emphasis on other environmental factors, such as wind speed and pollution. In future pandemic responses, utilizing more multidimensional and diverse predictors can improve the accuracy and clinical applicability of the model and reduce the detrimental effects of disease transmission and spread.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2562416
Citations
1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pandemic transmission forecasting: insights from COVID-19 modeling involving environmental factors

Yanping Wang, Qianzi Che, Zhaoyuan Gong, Nannan Shi et al.
1 citations
Critical Public Health
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
1.37
article

Pandemic transmission forecasting: insights from COVID-19 modeling involving environmental factors

Yanping Wang, Qianzi Che, Zhaoyuan Gong, Nannan Shi, Song Tian, Ning Liang, Bin Liu, Jing Guo, Lin Chen, Cuicui Cheng, Mingzhi Hu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Numerous mathematical models use various predictors and modeling approaches to forecast pandemics; however, given the diversity of these models, it remains unclear which type offers the most advantage. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the accuracy of models that incorporate natural, social, and pollution-related environmental factors to predict COVID-19 transmission, and to explore the potential role of predictive models in managing future large-scale epidemics. The results revealed that, although only six studies used mathematical models with both natural and social environmental predictors, these models outperformed those with only natural or pollution predictors. Currently, most models focus primarily on temperature and humidity, with limited emphasis on other environmental factors, such as wind speed and pollution. In future pandemic responses, utilizing more multidimensional and diverse predictors can improve the accuracy and clinical applicability of the model and reduce the detrimental effects of disease transmission and spread.

Critical Public HealthVol. 35(1)
China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pandemic transmission forecasting: insights from COVID-19 modeling involving environmental factors — Yanping Wang, Qianzi Che, et al. · Critical Public Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS