Waste To Energy Technologies InUrban Setting: Comparative Analysis Of Environmental And Economic Performance

This comprehensive study examines the environmental and economic performance of various waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies in urban settings. The research compares incineration, anaerobic digestion, gasification, and pyrolysis technologies, evaluating their efficiency, environmental impact, and economic viability. The study utilizes life cycle assessment (LCA) and cost-benefit analysis (CBA) methodologies to provide a holistic comparison. Results indicate that while incineration remains the most widely adopted WtE technology, anaerobic digestion shows promising environmental benefits, particularly in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Gasification and pyrolysis demonstrate potential for higher energy recovery but face challenges in terms of technological maturity and economic feasibility. The study concludes that the optimal WtE technology choice depends on specific urban contexts, waste composition, and local energy demands, emphasizing the need for tailored solutions in urban waste management strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v28i2s.7022
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Waste To Energy Technologies InUrban Setting: Comparative Analysis Of Environmental And Economic Performance

Ajeet Kumar Singh
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
article

Waste To Energy Technologies InUrban Setting: Comparative Analysis Of Environmental And Economic Performance

Ajeet Kumar Singh
article en

Abstract

This comprehensive study examines the environmental and economic performance of various waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies in urban settings. The research compares incineration, anaerobic digestion, gasification, and pyrolysis technologies, evaluating their efficiency, environmental impact, and economic viability. The study utilizes life cycle assessment (LCA) and cost-benefit analysis (CBA) methodologies to provide a holistic comparison. Results indicate that while incineration remains the most widely adopted WtE technology, anaerobic digestion shows promising environmental benefits, particularly in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Gasification and pyrolysis demonstrate potential for higher energy recovery but face challenges in terms of technological maturity and economic feasibility. The study concludes that the optimal WtE technology choice depends on specific urban contexts, waste composition, and local energy demands, emphasizing the need for tailored solutions in urban waste management strategies.

African Journal of Biomedical Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Waste To Energy Technologies InUrban Setting: Comparative Analysis Of Environmental And Economic Performance — Ajeet Kumar Singh · African Journal of Biomedical Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS