Patient preferences for violence screening in HIV care settings

Experiences of interpersonal- and community-level violence are common among people with HIV (PWH) and associated with poor health outcomes, underscoring a need to implement violence screening and support in HIV care. To inform this implementation, we explored preferences of PWH regarding integration of violence screening into HIV care. From February-December 2022, 64 in-depth interviews were conducted with PWH in Atlanta, Georgia as part of a larger mixed-methods study. Participants were purposively selected for diversity of gender, race/ethnicity, violence exposure history, HIV viral suppression, and retention in care. Themes explored included acceptability of violence screening in HIV care and preferences for doing so (in-person, paper-pencil, computerized), screening item phrasing, screening environment (by whom, where), timing of initial screen, and screening frequency. Violence screening in HIV care was highly acceptable and desirable. Collectively, preference was voiced for initiating screening at first HIV care visit and conducting screening regularly thereafter, in-person, by healthcare providers in a trauma-informed, conversational manner, with supplementation by telehealth or computerized comprehensive screeners to accommodate a variety of needs. This study, the first to detail preferences of PWH across gender and retention/viral suppression status, fills a key gap in evidence informing violence screening recommendations in national HIV care guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIDS Care
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2025.2562243
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient preferences for violence screening in HIV care settings

Ameeta S. Kalokhe, Madelyn S. Carlson, Katherine M. Anderson, Caroline W. Kokubun et al.
1 citations
AIDS Care
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
2.17
article

Patient preferences for violence screening in HIV care settings

Ameeta S. Kalokhe, Madelyn S. Carlson, Katherine M. Anderson, Caroline W. Kokubun, Celeste Ellison, Selaem Hadera, Eve Rose, Jessica M. Sales, Sophia Garbarino
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Experiences of interpersonal- and community-level violence are common among people with HIV (PWH) and associated with poor health outcomes, underscoring a need to implement violence screening and support in HIV care. To inform this implementation, we explored preferences of PWH regarding integration of violence screening into HIV care. From February-December 2022, 64 in-depth interviews were conducted with PWH in Atlanta, Georgia as part of a larger mixed-methods study. Participants were purposively selected for diversity of gender, race/ethnicity, violence exposure history, HIV viral suppression, and retention in care. Themes explored included acceptability of violence screening in HIV care and preferences for doing so (in-person, paper-pencil, computerized), screening item phrasing, screening environment (by whom, where), timing of initial screen, and screening frequency. Violence screening in HIV care was highly acceptable and desirable. Collectively, preference was voiced for initiating screening at first HIV care visit and conducting screening regularly thereafter, in-person, by healthcare providers in a trauma-informed, conversational manner, with supplementation by telehealth or computerized comprehensive screeners to accommodate a variety of needs. This study, the first to detail preferences of PWH across gender and retention/viral suppression status, fills a key gap in evidence informing violence screening recommendations in national HIV care guidelines.

AIDS CareVol. 37(12)
Emory University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Patient preferences for violence screening in HIV care settings — Ameeta S. Kalokhe, Madelyn S. Carlson, et al. · AIDS Care (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS