Diagnostic pitfalls: how availability and anchoring biases lead to errors in dermatology
This case highlights the susceptibility of dermatology to misdiagnosis. Availability bias in the clinical setting led to an inadequate biopsy method. Further anchoring bias then potentially influenced histologic interpretation and management decisions. Insufficient appreciation of Kaposi Sarcoma development in the setting of well-controlled HIV also further influenced the diagnosis rendered. Mohs Surgery evaluation allowed for de-biased clinical and histologic assessment, correcting diagnosis. Several overlying factors, such as time pressures, knowledge gaps, and technique limitations, create a reliance on cognitive heuristics. Recognizing these external pressures can help clinicians enhance diagnostic accuracy by systematically considering alternative diagnoses.
Authors
- Robert A. Baiocchi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1619-4853)
- Austin Cusick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8182-5252)
- Stephanie K. Fabbro
- Angela Casey
- Leo Wan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2485-4708)
Institutions
- West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine (US)
- Lehigh Valley Hospital-Pocono (US)
- Riverside Methodist Hospital (US)
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US)
- Lehigh Valley Health Network (US)
- State Science and Technology Institute (US)
- Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Center (US)
- Columbus Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Diagnosis
- Published
- 2025-09-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0001
- Primary Topic
- Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00