The Notorious SBG: Administrators’ Perceptions of Standards-Based Grading Practices
This mixed-methods study synthesizes Standards-Based Grading (SBG) literature, analyzes 249 Arkansas administrators’ survey responses using OLS regressions, and identifies themes through in-vivo coding of qualitative feedback. Results show more SBG support among liberal, elementary-level administrators in larger, economically diverse districts. Qualitative insights highlight structural barriers and mindsets against SBG, emphasizing its importance for mastery-focused assessment and grading alignment. These findings underscore the influence of principals’ beliefs on SBG support and suggest researching the contextual and ideological factors influencing SBG’s implementation.
Authors
- Jonathan Wai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7686-1312)
- Sarah Ruth Morris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2949-4337)
- Robert Maranto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6796-3627)
- Fabio Andrés Parra-Martínez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3366-8499)
Institutions
- Arkansas Department of Education (US)
- University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of School Leadership
- Published
- 2025-09-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846251382329
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Higher Education Learning Practices
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.93