Stimulus-response binding and retrieval operates independently of contingency awareness: A mega-analysis

There is an ongoing debate about the role of top-down influences on episodic binding and retrieval processes. The Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC) framework postulates that both, binding and retrieval, are modulated by top-down processes, such as awareness and instructions (Frings et al., 2020). To test this assumption, we conducted a mega-analysis in which we reanalyzed data from four contingency learning experiments (total N = 859). Contingency awareness was assessed in all experiments. Furthermore, in two experiments, contingency awareness was experimentally manipulated by instructing participants about the existing contingencies. Results show that both binding and retrieval neither depend on nor are modulated by higher-order processes such as contingency knowledge or awareness of stimulus-response contingencies (measured and manipulated). In sum, our findings suggest that stimulus-response binding and retrieval is an automatic cognitive process that operates unconsciously and independently of top-down influences such as contingency knowledge and awareness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Consciousness and Cognition
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2025.103936
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stimulus-response binding and retrieval operates independently of contingency awareness: A mega-analysis

Carina G. Giesen, Matthäus Rudolph
1 citations
Consciousness and Cognition
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
article

Stimulus-response binding and retrieval operates independently of contingency awareness: A mega-analysis

Carina G. Giesen, Matthäus Rudolph
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate about the role of top-down influences on episodic binding and retrieval processes. The Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC) framework postulates that both, binding and retrieval, are modulated by top-down processes, such as awareness and instructions (Frings et al., 2020). To test this assumption, we conducted a mega-analysis in which we reanalyzed data from four contingency learning experiments (total N = 859). Contingency awareness was assessed in all experiments. Furthermore, in two experiments, contingency awareness was experimentally manipulated by instructing participants about the existing contingencies. Results show that both binding and retrieval neither depend on nor are modulated by higher-order processes such as contingency knowledge or awareness of stimulus-response contingencies (measured and manipulated). In sum, our findings suggest that stimulus-response binding and retrieval is an automatic cognitive process that operates unconsciously and independently of top-down influences such as contingency knowledge and awareness.

Consciousness and CognitionVol. 135
University of Erfurt (DE), University of Applied Sciences Erfurt (DE), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stimulus-response binding and retrieval operates independently of contingency awareness: A mega-analysis — Carina G. Giesen, Matthäus Rudolph · Consciousness and Cognition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS