Understanding consumer trust and distrust in a public service ecosystem

Purpose Despite consumer trust being a key construct within the services marketing domain, there is a lack of consensus on the conceptualisation – specifically the relationship with distrust, and variations across different actors in the services ecosystem. The purpose of this study is to explore the conceptualisations of trust and distrust across different levels of a public service ecosystem in a transformative context of energy services. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review of 70 academic papers that explore trust and distrust in the energy service sector was undertaken. Findings The results revealed two potential models of the relationship between trust and distrust in a public service ecosystem. Furthermore, the results identified that trust and distrust appear to vary for different actors in the energy service ecosystem and have different antecedent factors. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to directly compare and explore the differences between trust and distrust in a public service context and identified little consensus in the conceptualisation of trust and distrust. Furthermore, this study is the first to adopt an ecosystem perspective for trust or distrust with trust resulting from interactions with individuals at all levels of the ecosystem whereas distrust was derived from structures and processes at the meso and macro-level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Services Marketing
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-01-2025-0059
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding consumer trust and distrust in a public service ecosystem

Rebekah Russell‐Bennett, Aleksandra Van Hummel
1 citations
Journal of Services Marketing
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
2.76
article

Understanding consumer trust and distrust in a public service ecosystem

Rebekah Russell‐Bennett, Aleksandra Van Hummel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Despite consumer trust being a key construct within the services marketing domain, there is a lack of consensus on the conceptualisation – specifically the relationship with distrust, and variations across different actors in the services ecosystem. The purpose of this study is to explore the conceptualisations of trust and distrust across different levels of a public service ecosystem in a transformative context of energy services. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review of 70 academic papers that explore trust and distrust in the energy service sector was undertaken. Findings The results revealed two potential models of the relationship between trust and distrust in a public service ecosystem. Furthermore, the results identified that trust and distrust appear to vary for different actors in the energy service ecosystem and have different antecedent factors. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to directly compare and explore the differences between trust and distrust in a public service context and identified little consensus in the conceptualisation of trust and distrust. Furthermore, this study is the first to adopt an ecosystem perspective for trust or distrust with trust resulting from interactions with individuals at all levels of the ecosystem whereas distrust was derived from structures and processes at the meso and macro-level.

Journal of Services MarketingVol. 40(2)
University of Canberra (AU), Australian Government (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.