A global sea turtle climate vulnerability assessment

• A climate vulnerability assessment was conducted for 49 sea turtle management units. • The majority of management units scored very high exposure to climate change. • Nearly all management units scored high or very high sensitivity to climate change. • The most influential exposure factors included temperature, ocean acidification, dissolved oxygen, and sea level rise. • The most influential sensitivity attributes varied by species and region. Climate change presents challenges to the conservation of sea turtle populations that are already experiencing multiple cumulative anthropogenic stressors including persistent stressors such as harvest, bycatch, and habitat destruction. To inform management and conservation decision-making, we applied a climate vulnerability assessment (CVA) using expert elicitation to provide a qualitative assessment of vulnerability, exposure, and sensitivity to climate change of 49 sea turtle management units (i.e., Regional Management Units and Distinct Population Segments). Eighteen sea turtle experts scored climate exposure (projected changes in climate and ocean conditions within the current population distribution compared with historical conditions) and climate sensitivity (using life history traits as proxies). Results indicate that all management units have either very high (88% of units) or high (12% of units) exposure to climate change, with the most influential factors across all regions being temperature, ocean acidification, dissolved oxygen, and sea level rise. Forty-three percent of the management units have very high sensitivity to climate change, 49% have high sensitivity, and 8% moderate sensitivity. Key factors for sensitivity included nest/egg sensitivity to temperature, in-water habitat specificity, abundance, and trend in population abundance, although primary drivers varied by species and region. The resulting climate vulnerability score was very high for 88% of the management units, high for 10%, and moderate for 2%. This assessment quantified the vulnerability of individual sea turtle management units to climate change, identified data gaps to help guide research, and established a baseline for comparison with future sea turtle assessment efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114143
Primary Topic
Turtle Biology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A global sea turtle climate vulnerability assessment

Roger B. Griffis, Christina C. Fahy, Alexander R. Gaos, Ann Marie Lauritsen et al.
Ecological Indicators
Turtle Biology and Conservation
article

A global sea turtle climate vulnerability assessment

Roger B. Griffis, Christina C. Fahy, Alexander R. Gaos, Ann Marie Lauritsen, Jeanette Wyneken, Heather L. Haas, Irene Kelly, Dorothy M. Dick, Paolo Casale, Dennis L. Klemm, Susanna Piovano, Lauren Kurpita, Mariana M. P. B. Fuentes, Michael J. Liles, Thane Wibbels, Vincent S. Saba, Matthew D. Lettrich, Carrie M. Upite, Mark Hamann, Earl Possardt, Camryn D. Allen, Jeffrey A. Seminoff, Yonat Swimmer, Christopher R. Sasso, Summer L. Martin, Barbara A. Schroeder, T. Todd Jones, Manjita Tiwari
article en

Abstract

• A climate vulnerability assessment was conducted for 49 sea turtle management units. • The majority of management units scored very high exposure to climate change. • Nearly all management units scored high or very high sensitivity to climate change. • The most influential exposure factors included temperature, ocean acidification, dissolved oxygen, and sea level rise. • The most influential sensitivity attributes varied by species and region. Climate change presents challenges to the conservation of sea turtle populations that are already experiencing multiple cumulative anthropogenic stressors including persistent stressors such as harvest, bycatch, and habitat destruction. To inform management and conservation decision-making, we applied a climate vulnerability assessment (CVA) using expert elicitation to provide a qualitative assessment of vulnerability, exposure, and sensitivity to climate change of 49 sea turtle management units (i.e., Regional Management Units and Distinct Population Segments). Eighteen sea turtle experts scored climate exposure (projected changes in climate and ocean conditions within the current population distribution compared with historical conditions) and climate sensitivity (using life history traits as proxies). Results indicate that all management units have either very high (88% of units) or high (12% of units) exposure to climate change, with the most influential factors across all regions being temperature, ocean acidification, dissolved oxygen, and sea level rise. Forty-three percent of the management units have very high sensitivity to climate change, 49% have high sensitivity, and 8% moderate sensitivity. Key factors for sensitivity included nest/egg sensitivity to temperature, in-water habitat specificity, abundance, and trend in population abundance, although primary drivers varied by species and region. The resulting climate vulnerability score was very high for 88% of the management units, high for 10%, and moderate for 2%. This assessment quantified the vulnerability of individual sea turtle management units to climate change, identified data gaps to help guide research, and established a baseline for comparison with future sea turtle assessment efforts.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 179
Florida State University (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US), University of Pisa (IT), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Federal Department of Finance (CH), Office of Science (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center (US), National Office for Technology Acquisition and Promotion (NG), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center (US), James Cook University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Turtle Biology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.