Model Tests on Influence Factors on the Pullout Behavior of Suction Caisson in Stratified Soils

As offshore wind power constructions expand into deep waters, suction caissons have gradually become the preferred foundation. The controlled load of the suction caisson for the deep‐water wind turbine is the pullout load. A series of experimental tests have been conducted focusing on various factors influencing the pullout bearing capacity, including the stratified soil type, pullout rate, and loading frequency. Results indicated a significant impact of stratified soil types on the pullout bearing capacity. In the clay‐over‐sand stratified soil type, the pullout bearing capacities are found to be 425%, 155%, 283%, and 377% relative to those in pure sand, sandwich soil, sand‐over‐clay, and pure clay under monotonic pullout loadings. When the suction caissons are installed in stratified soils, increases in pullout rates are observed to enhance both the bearing capacity and the associated passive suction and displacement until the pullout bearing capacity is achieved. Low‐frequency cyclic loading induces greater accumulative displacement than high‐frequency cyclic loading. Mechanism of cyclic loading reducing the pullout capacity is detected by a Perspex model. Both pullout bearing capacity and passive suction are more substantially reduced after cyclic loading at high pullout rates. Considering the effect of stratified soil, modified equations are proposed to obtain the friction forces and reverse end bearing capacity. The research results are useful for further elucidating the mechanism of suction caisson in stratified soils to guide the engineering practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Civil Engineering
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/adce/7590104
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model Tests on Influence Factors on the Pullout Behavior of Suction Caisson in Stratified Soils

Yang Ou, Jianglong Zheng, Jinhe Chen, Dayong Li et al.
Advances in Civil Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Model Tests on Influence Factors on the Pullout Behavior of Suction Caisson in Stratified Soils

Yang Ou, Jianglong Zheng, Jinhe Chen, Dayong Li, Zhi Li, Lunbo Luo
article en

Abstract

As offshore wind power constructions expand into deep waters, suction caissons have gradually become the preferred foundation. The controlled load of the suction caisson for the deep‐water wind turbine is the pullout load. A series of experimental tests have been conducted focusing on various factors influencing the pullout bearing capacity, including the stratified soil type, pullout rate, and loading frequency. Results indicated a significant impact of stratified soil types on the pullout bearing capacity. In the clay‐over‐sand stratified soil type, the pullout bearing capacities are found to be 425%, 155%, 283%, and 377% relative to those in pure sand, sandwich soil, sand‐over‐clay, and pure clay under monotonic pullout loadings. When the suction caissons are installed in stratified soils, increases in pullout rates are observed to enhance both the bearing capacity and the associated passive suction and displacement until the pullout bearing capacity is achieved. Low‐frequency cyclic loading induces greater accumulative displacement than high‐frequency cyclic loading. Mechanism of cyclic loading reducing the pullout capacity is detected by a Perspex model. Both pullout bearing capacity and passive suction are more substantially reduced after cyclic loading at high pullout rates. Considering the effect of stratified soil, modified equations are proposed to obtain the friction forces and reverse end bearing capacity. The research results are useful for further elucidating the mechanism of suction caisson in stratified soils to guide the engineering practice.

Advances in Civil EngineeringVol. 2025(1)
China Three Gorges Corporation (China) (CN), Fujian Electric Power Survey & Design Institute (CN), Zhangzhou Vocational and Technical College (CN), China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.