Mechanical Testing of 3D-Printed Pediatric Trachea-Shaped Specimens: A Suitability Study

In the absence of standard procedures for testing 3D-printed soft polymers, an experimental protocol was proposed to assess the suitability of Flexible 80A Resin for a pediatric trachea anatomical 3D model for surgical simulation. Eighteen specimens printed via stereolithography are involved, including anatomical, cylindrical, and dog-bone shapes, to investigate the geometry effect on measured properties. Static tensile tests revealed that using standardized dog-bone specimens as a reference for the material’s Young’s modulus leads to a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) up to 50% compared to anatomical specimens. Measurement uncertainty combined repeatability with input errors, and the ANOVA test confirmed the need for dedicated mechanical measurements when evaluating complex 3D-printed geometries. The study concludes the suitability of selected material: the average elastic modulus of anatomical specimens was 4.75 MPa, closely matching values reported for tracheal tissue in the literature, with a MAPE of only 2%. Dynamic mechanical tests showed trachea-like viscoelasticity: anatomical specimens were consistently stiffer and more dissipative than cylindrical ones. Creep tests confirmed the viscoelastic behavior simulating airway time scales. The anatomical specimens exhibit faster local relaxation, while cylindrical ones show slower long-term relaxation, both modeled by a two-element generalized Maxwell model (R2 = 0.99 and 0.98).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910352
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanical Testing of 3D-Printed Pediatric Trachea-Shaped Specimens: A Suitability Study

M. Barletta, Luca Borro, Aurelio Secinaro, Giorgia Fiori et al.
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Anatomy and Medical Technology
0.67
article

Mechanical Testing of 3D-Printed Pediatric Trachea-Shaped Specimens: A Suitability Study

M. Barletta, Luca Borro, Aurelio Secinaro, Giorgia Fiori, Andrea Scorza, Salvatore Andrea Sciuto, Annalisa Genovesi, Jan Galo, Marta Cecchitelli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the absence of standard procedures for testing 3D-printed soft polymers, an experimental protocol was proposed to assess the suitability of Flexible 80A Resin for a pediatric trachea anatomical 3D model for surgical simulation. Eighteen specimens printed via stereolithography are involved, including anatomical, cylindrical, and dog-bone shapes, to investigate the geometry effect on measured properties. Static tensile tests revealed that using standardized dog-bone specimens as a reference for the material’s Young’s modulus leads to a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) up to 50% compared to anatomical specimens. Measurement uncertainty combined repeatability with input errors, and the ANOVA test confirmed the need for dedicated mechanical measurements when evaluating complex 3D-printed geometries. The study concludes the suitability of selected material: the average elastic modulus of anatomical specimens was 4.75 MPa, closely matching values reported for tracheal tissue in the literature, with a MAPE of only 2%. Dynamic mechanical tests showed trachea-like viscoelasticity: anatomical specimens were consistently stiffer and more dissipative than cylindrical ones. Creep tests confirmed the viscoelastic behavior simulating airway time scales. The anatomical specimens exhibit faster local relaxation, while cylindrical ones show slower long-term relaxation, both modeled by a two-element generalized Maxwell model (R2 = 0.99 and 0.98).

Applied SciencesVol. 15(19)
Roma Tre University (IT), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.