Sustainability Practices, Corporate Value, and Financial Risk: Is There an Academic Consensus? A Systematic Bibliometric Review

This study presents a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of the relationship between sustainability practices—commonly framed within the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) framework—and both corporate value creation and financial risk mitigation. Our primary objective is to assess how ESG initiatives affect firm outcomes, with particular emphasis on risk reduction, a dimension less explored in the economic and financial literature. The search was conducted in the Web of Science database on 15 June 2024, using the keywords “ESG and Financial Risk” and “ESG and Valuation,” yielding 1074 initial records. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we analyzed the final sample through descriptive and frequency-based methods. Findings reveal no clear consensus on the connection between ESG and value creation, with results varying across sectors, firm sizes, regions, and specific ESG components. In contrast, the evidence supporting the link between ESG practices and financial risk mitigation is stronger: 68% of the reviewed studies reported a positive relationship, while only 5% found negative effects. This review underscores the potential of sustainability as a risk-management mechanism and highlights research gaps that warrant deeper exploration. Limitations include heterogeneity of methodologies, metrics, and contexts among the studies reviewed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18100536
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability Practices, Corporate Value, and Financial Risk: Is There an Academic Consensus? A Systematic Bibliometric Review

Felippe Aparecido Cippiciani, José Roberto Ferreira Savóia, Daniel Reed Bergmann, Frédéric de Mariz
4 citations
Journal of risk and financial management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
8.91
article

Sustainability Practices, Corporate Value, and Financial Risk: Is There an Academic Consensus? A Systematic Bibliometric Review

Felippe Aparecido Cippiciani, José Roberto Ferreira Savóia, Daniel Reed Bergmann, Frédéric de Mariz
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study presents a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of the relationship between sustainability practices—commonly framed within the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) framework—and both corporate value creation and financial risk mitigation. Our primary objective is to assess how ESG initiatives affect firm outcomes, with particular emphasis on risk reduction, a dimension less explored in the economic and financial literature. The search was conducted in the Web of Science database on 15 June 2024, using the keywords “ESG and Financial Risk” and “ESG and Valuation,” yielding 1074 initial records. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we analyzed the final sample through descriptive and frequency-based methods. Findings reveal no clear consensus on the connection between ESG and value creation, with results varying across sectors, firm sizes, regions, and specific ESG components. In contrast, the evidence supporting the link between ESG practices and financial risk mitigation is stronger: 68% of the reviewed studies reported a positive relationship, while only 5% found negative effects. This review underscores the potential of sustainability as a risk-management mechanism and highlights research gaps that warrant deeper exploration. Limitations include heterogeneity of methodologies, metrics, and contexts among the studies reviewed.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 18(10)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
8.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.