The Price Gap in Agriculture‐Based Greenhouse Gas Offset Markets

ABSTRACT Today, there is a global effort to reduce greenhouse gas net emissions (GHGNE). For economic well‐being, it is important to identify low‐cost means of net emission offsets. Agriculture and forestry have received considerable attention as a means of supplying emissions offsets, as they contribute nearly 20% of global emissions. However, given that other sources of emissions also present opportunities for reducing GHGNE, the issue of comparative offset costs becomes important. This paper examines the offset costs associated with reducing net carbon dioxide equivalent emissions in agriculture and highlights the relative costs and associated cost components. We discuss an approach for estimating the per‐tonne GHGNE cost and formulate expressions for the cost to buyers, payments to sellers, and the gap in between in the context of a potential carbon market. Case studies are conducted to estimate the gap for different situations. We believe differences in claimable versus saleable GHGNE quantities and market transaction costs, in part, explain the large variation in observed prices paid for different emission offset actions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70052
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Price Gap in Agriculture‐Based Greenhouse Gas Offset Markets

Jingyi W. Liu, Chengcheng J. Fei, Bruce A. McCarl
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

The Price Gap in Agriculture‐Based Greenhouse Gas Offset Markets

Jingyi W. Liu, Chengcheng J. Fei, Bruce A. McCarl
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Today, there is a global effort to reduce greenhouse gas net emissions (GHGNE). For economic well‐being, it is important to identify low‐cost means of net emission offsets. Agriculture and forestry have received considerable attention as a means of supplying emissions offsets, as they contribute nearly 20% of global emissions. However, given that other sources of emissions also present opportunities for reducing GHGNE, the issue of comparative offset costs becomes important. This paper examines the offset costs associated with reducing net carbon dioxide equivalent emissions in agriculture and highlights the relative costs and associated cost components. We discuss an approach for estimating the per‐tonne GHGNE cost and formulate expressions for the cost to buyers, payments to sellers, and the gap in between in the context of a potential carbon market. Case studies are conducted to estimate the gap for different situations. We believe differences in claimable versus saleable GHGNE quantities and market transaction costs, in part, explain the large variation in observed prices paid for different emission offset actions.

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.