Quality of Care for Hypertension in Primary Health Care in South Africa: Cross-Sectional Feasibility Study

<b>Introduction</b>: Little is known about the quality of care for patients with hypertension in primary health care (PHC) facilities in South Africa, where most people receive care. <b>Objectives:</b> To test 46 quality indicators, developed previously, to assess and improve care; to assess the indicators' clinimetric properties; and to recommend improvement strategies. <b>Methods:</b> A descriptive cross-sectional clinical audit in a purposive sample of 12 South African PHC clinics involving a retrospective review of 295 patient medical records. <b>Results:</b> A total of 45 of the 46 indicators were tested in the main sample (n = 295), of which 9 indicators could not be applied. Of the 36 applicable indicators, 22 could be applied and measured for ≥75% of the sample, while 14 were applicable to ≤50% of the sample. Only five indicators showed a quality of care score for ≥75% of patients. Overall, 82% and 92% of the sample had their blood pressure (BP) recorded in the last 12 months or in the previous 5 years for those aged >40, respectively, and 53.2% had a controlled BP. In the last 12 months, 30% of patients had a cholesterol record, 30% had their BMI recorded, 17% had a hypertension review with a medical practitioner, and 12% had received lifestyle advice. Only 38% received all clinically indicated antihypertensive medicines at their last visit. <b>Conclusion:</b> There were gaps in the quality of care for patients with hypertension, demonstrating the need for greater adherence to evidence-based guidelines, better data quality, and the use of electronic health information systems. Twenty-two indicators are recommended to address these gaps and improve the quality of care, patient outcomes, and the health care system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13192398
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of Care for Hypertension in Primary Health Care in South Africa: Cross-Sectional Feasibility Study

Stephen Campbell, Johanna C. Meyer, Enos M Rampamba, Brian Godman
Healthcare
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Quality of Care for Hypertension in Primary Health Care in South Africa: Cross-Sectional Feasibility Study

Stephen Campbell, Johanna C. Meyer, Enos M Rampamba, Brian Godman
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: Little is known about the quality of care for patients with hypertension in primary health care (PHC) facilities in South Africa, where most people receive care. <b>Objectives:</b> To test 46 quality indicators, developed previously, to assess and improve care; to assess the indicators' clinimetric properties; and to recommend improvement strategies. <b>Methods:</b> A descriptive cross-sectional clinical audit in a purposive sample of 12 South African PHC clinics involving a retrospective review of 295 patient medical records. <b>Results:</b> A total of 45 of the 46 indicators were tested in the main sample (n = 295), of which 9 indicators could not be applied. Of the 36 applicable indicators, 22 could be applied and measured for ≥75% of the sample, while 14 were applicable to ≤50% of the sample. Only five indicators showed a quality of care score for ≥75% of patients. Overall, 82% and 92% of the sample had their blood pressure (BP) recorded in the last 12 months or in the previous 5 years for those aged >40, respectively, and 53.2% had a controlled BP. In the last 12 months, 30% of patients had a cholesterol record, 30% had their BMI recorded, 17% had a hypertension review with a medical practitioner, and 12% had received lifestyle advice. Only 38% received all clinically indicated antihypertensive medicines at their last visit. <b>Conclusion:</b> There were gaps in the quality of care for patients with hypertension, demonstrating the need for greater adherence to evidence-based guidelines, better data quality, and the use of electronic health information systems. Twenty-two indicators are recommended to address these gaps and improve the quality of care, patient outcomes, and the health care system.

HealthcareVol. 13(19)
St George's, University of London (GB), University of Strathclyde (GB), Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (ZA), University of Manchester (GB), Institute of Infection and Immunity (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.