From "Objective Record" to "Poetic History Interpretation"- Stephen Owen's Discussion of the Tradition of "Nonfiction" in Chinese Literature and the Theory of Poetry and History

In his work "Chinese Traditional Poetry and Poetics: The World's Signs", Stephen Owen establishes a poetic theory of the "non-fiction" tradition in Chinese literature. This theory and the Poetic-Historical Theory demonstrate mutual interpretation across three dimensions: At the authenticity level, the "empirical truth" of non-fiction and the "recording spirit" of poetic history achieve dialectical unity; at the narrative level, the ideological tendency of using poetry to verify history and document historical events intertwines with the scene reconstruction and dialogue recording in non-fiction; at the reality engagement level, both approaches respond to reality through literature, forming spiritual resonance. Their mutual interpretation provides a cross-cultural dialogue paradigm for classical literary studies, offering insights into reconstructing the concept of "authenticity" and the path of literary localization.

Publication Details

Journal
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23977/langl.2025.080414
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From "Objective Record" to "Poetic History Interpretation"- Stephen Owen's Discussion of the Tradition of "Nonfiction" in Chinese Literature and the Theory of Poetry and History

Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
Chinese history and philosophy
article

From "Objective Record" to "Poetic History Interpretation"- Stephen Owen's Discussion of the Tradition of "Nonfiction" in Chinese Literature and the Theory of Poetry and History

article en

Abstract

In his work "Chinese Traditional Poetry and Poetics: The World's Signs", Stephen Owen establishes a poetic theory of the "non-fiction" tradition in Chinese literature. This theory and the Poetic-Historical Theory demonstrate mutual interpretation across three dimensions: At the authenticity level, the "empirical truth" of non-fiction and the "recording spirit" of poetic history achieve dialectical unity; at the narrative level, the ideological tendency of using poetry to verify history and document historical events intertwines with the scene reconstruction and dialogue recording in non-fiction; at the reality engagement level, both approaches respond to reality through literature, forming spiritual resonance. Their mutual interpretation provides a cross-cultural dialogue paradigm for classical literary studies, offering insights into reconstructing the concept of "authenticity" and the path of literary localization.

Lecture Notes on Language and LiteratureVol. 8(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.