The Sovereignty Exception: China's State-Centric Approach to National Security in Cross-Border Data Flows

This study examines China's broad application of the national security exception governing cross-border data flows. We trace the development of the exception from being the "constructive ambiguity" in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) Article XXI exception, to an exception subject to limited judicial review. By examining the distinctive Chinese legal framework on data flows enforced through its Cybersecurity Law, Data Security Law and Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), we identify a Chinese legal concept of "data sovereignty." A case study of the Didi Chuxing cybersecurity review serves to illustrate how this state-centric regulation of data flows works in practice. In light of the EU's rights-centric and US's power-centric normative approach to data flows, China's legal safeguards for cross-border data flow reveal fundamental tensions in global data governance. We argue that, while internally coherent, the Chinese approach creates serious uncertainty for multinational firms, challenges global norms of international trade law and is a leading contributor to the phenomenon of "digital decoupling".

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.ld27192
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sovereignty Exception: China's State-Centric Approach to National Security in Cross-Border Data Flows

Jun Niu
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

The Sovereignty Exception: China's State-Centric Approach to National Security in Cross-Border Data Flows

Jun Niu
article en

Abstract

This study examines China's broad application of the national security exception governing cross-border data flows. We trace the development of the exception from being the "constructive ambiguity" in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) Article XXI exception, to an exception subject to limited judicial review. By examining the distinctive Chinese legal framework on data flows enforced through its Cybersecurity Law, Data Security Law and Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), we identify a Chinese legal concept of "data sovereignty." A case study of the Didi Chuxing cybersecurity review serves to illustrate how this state-centric regulation of data flows works in practice. In light of the EU's rights-centric and US's power-centric normative approach to data flows, China's legal safeguards for cross-border data flow reveal fundamental tensions in global data governance. We argue that, while internally coherent, the Chinese approach creates serious uncertainty for multinational firms, challenges global norms of international trade law and is a leading contributor to the phenomenon of "digital decoupling".

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaVol. 107(1)
East China University of Political Science and Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.