Trust, Rights, and Inclusion in the European Union: A Case Study of the European Arrest Warrant and the Fundamental Status of EU Citizenship

This article focuses on the two core mechanisms of the European Union - the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) and EU citizenship, dissecting the gap between the idealized assumptions based on mutual trust and equality and the reality behind them. Research has found that due to the regression of the rule of law in some member states, the EAW system faces problems such as impaired judicial independence and an imbalance in the protection of fundamental rights. The Court of Justice of the European Union has shifted to the principle of conditional trust. However, in practice, EU citizenship shows selective inclusiveness. Factors such as economic status and race lead to uneven entitlement. The experience of Romanian caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic is a case in point. The article advocates for establishing a trust review mechanism at the EU level, strengthening rights impact assessment, and promoting social policy coordination and other reforms to build a rights-based EU integration model and balance the efficiency of judicial cooperation and social inclusiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.br27008
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust, Rights, and Inclusion in the European Union: A Case Study of the European Arrest Warrant and the Fundamental Status of EU Citizenship

Ahai Chen
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

Trust, Rights, and Inclusion in the European Union: A Case Study of the European Arrest Warrant and the Fundamental Status of EU Citizenship

Ahai Chen
article en

Abstract

This article focuses on the two core mechanisms of the European Union - the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) and EU citizenship, dissecting the gap between the idealized assumptions based on mutual trust and equality and the reality behind them. Research has found that due to the regression of the rule of law in some member states, the EAW system faces problems such as impaired judicial independence and an imbalance in the protection of fundamental rights. The Court of Justice of the European Union has shifted to the principle of conditional trust. However, in practice, EU citizenship shows selective inclusiveness. Factors such as economic status and race lead to uneven entitlement. The experience of Romanian caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic is a case in point. The article advocates for establishing a trust review mechanism at the EU level, strengthening rights impact assessment, and promoting social policy coordination and other reforms to build a rights-based EU integration model and balance the efficiency of judicial cooperation and social inclusiveness.

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaVol. 112(1)
University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trust, Rights, and Inclusion in the European Union: A Case Study of the European Arrest Warrant and the Fundamental Status of EU Citizenship — Ahai Chen · Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS