Rivers, Straits and Power: Global Infrastructure Game from Yarlung Zangbo Hydropower Project

On July 19, 2025, in Nyingchi, Tibet, the lower Yarlung Zangbo River hydropower project with a total investment of about 1.2 trillion yuan was officially started. As a downstream country, India regarded it as a geopolitical challenge. The traditional single territorial dispute has evolved into a complex competition and cooperation with water resources, scientific and technological strength and economic ability as the core. The project can not only accelerate the transformation of Chinas green energy, upgrade Tibets infrastructure, but also strengthen the economic resilience of border areas; At the same time, India is worried that the upstream regulation will solidify Chinas dominance in the disputed area and reduce its water security. The Yarlung Zangbo River case shows that large-scale infrastructure has gone beyond the scope of technology and become a key variable in reshaping the regional power structure. Similar logic also appears in the geopolitical game between the Strait of Malacca and the Suez Canal. In the future, the form of international conflict may change from military confrontation to engineering competition with infrastructure as the carrier, and controlling the dominant power of infrastructure is to master the right to speak and initiative. In this context, this paper uses case analysis to study and compare the international status of different countries, and obtains the Countermeasures of countries with different status through secondary data and secondary literature research. In the future, in the large-scale infrastructure game, large countries will expand their influence through financing, technical standards and cooperation strategies, while passive countries will safeguard their sovereignty through multilateral cooperation, technological autonomy and legal framework. All parties need to find a balance in the three dimensions of financing, technology and cooperation to achieve sustainable development and mutual benefit and win-win results of global infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.gl27233
Primary Topic
Transboundary Water Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rivers, Straits and Power: Global Infrastructure Game from Yarlung Zangbo Hydropower Project

Zhen Cai
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Transboundary Water Resource Management
article

Rivers, Straits and Power: Global Infrastructure Game from Yarlung Zangbo Hydropower Project

Zhen Cai
article en

Abstract

On July 19, 2025, in Nyingchi, Tibet, the lower Yarlung Zangbo River hydropower project with a total investment of about 1.2 trillion yuan was officially started. As a downstream country, India regarded it as a geopolitical challenge. The traditional single territorial dispute has evolved into a complex competition and cooperation with water resources, scientific and technological strength and economic ability as the core. The project can not only accelerate the transformation of Chinas green energy, upgrade Tibets infrastructure, but also strengthen the economic resilience of border areas; At the same time, India is worried that the upstream regulation will solidify Chinas dominance in the disputed area and reduce its water security. The Yarlung Zangbo River case shows that large-scale infrastructure has gone beyond the scope of technology and become a key variable in reshaping the regional power structure. Similar logic also appears in the geopolitical game between the Strait of Malacca and the Suez Canal. In the future, the form of international conflict may change from military confrontation to engineering competition with infrastructure as the carrier, and controlling the dominant power of infrastructure is to master the right to speak and initiative. In this context, this paper uses case analysis to study and compare the international status of different countries, and obtains the Countermeasures of countries with different status through secondary data and secondary literature research. In the future, in the large-scale infrastructure game, large countries will expand their influence through financing, technical standards and cooperation strategies, while passive countries will safeguard their sovereignty through multilateral cooperation, technological autonomy and legal framework. All parties need to find a balance in the three dimensions of financing, technology and cooperation to achieve sustainable development and mutual benefit and win-win results of global infrastructure.

Advances in Economics Management and Political SciencesVol. 216(1)
Universidad del Noreste (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Transboundary Water Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rivers, Straits and Power: Global Infrastructure Game from Yarlung Zangbo Hydropower Project — Zhen Cai · Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS