Utility of PROM Questionnaires: Correlation of Question Burden and Response Rate Among Surgically Treated Patients with Musculoskeletal Diseases
<b>Objectives:</b> Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) constitute a patient-centered way to assess treatment outcomes in musculoskeletal diseases. In this study, we explored the factors affecting the response rate when systematically utilizing PROMs for operatively treated patients in a clinical setting. The purpose was to find factors that could be influenced to improve the response rates of questionnaires in the future. <b>Methods</b>: The data were collected from a large institutional registry, divided into seven sub-registries (hand, elbow, shoulder, back, hip, knee, and foot and ankle), by gathering demographic data and joint-specific and generic PROM results. The data were collected preoperatively, as well as postoperatively at 3 months and 1 year. We analyzed patient demographics, the questionnaire format, and the length of each questionnaire, which were hypothesized to be the factors associated with the response rate. <b>Results</b>: The study sample consisted of 2295 patients with operatively treated musculoskeletal conditions. A response rate of 60% or above was obtained for the whole patient cohort at all three time points, although not in all sub-registries. A higher number of questionnaire items (-0.021, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the patients' smoking status (-0.395, <i>p</i> = 0.002) were associated with a lower response rate. The response rate increased with the patient age up to 75 years and decreased thereafter. <b>Conclusions</b>: A suitable limit for the number of questions in a PROM questionnaire might be 50 to ensure the required 60% response rate to obtain generalizable results. Special effort should be made to improve the PROM response rate among the younger adult patient population.
Authors
- Ida Rantalaiho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-1900)
- Katri Pernaa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8325-0379)
- Inari Laaksonen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6272-4010)
- Hanna‐Stiina Taskinen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3468-9026)
- Anssi Ryösä (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7304-9700)
- Ville Äärimaa
- Joel Kostensalo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9883-1256)
- Karita Kohtala (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8575-2900)
- Saara Meronen
Institutions
- University of Turku (FI)
- Turku University Hospital (FI)
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Published
- 2025-09-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196728
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.01