A novel method for correcting water budget components and reducing their uncertainties by optimally distributing the imbalance residual without full closure

Abstract. Achieving water budget closure improves the consistency of water budget component datasets, including precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET), streamflow (Q) and terrestrial water storage change (TWSC), thereby advancing our understanding of basin-scale water cycle dynamics. Existing water budget closure correction (BCC) methods typically aim to eliminate the entire water imbalance error (ΔRes) by fully redistributing it across budget components. However, this often overlooks the trade-off between achieving perfect closure and the errors introduced into the corrected components through this redistribution. Moreover, inaccurate estimation of redistribution weights can lead to contradictory outcomes, such as negative values in P, ET, or Q. In this study, we quantify the uncertainties introduced by four existing BCC methods (CKF, MCL, MSD, and PR) at the monthly scale across 84 basins spanning diverse climate zones. We then propose a novel method, IWE-Res, which identifies an optimal redistributing strategy by minimizing the combined error from both the errors introduced to individual budget components and the remaining ΔRes error. This method also reduces the occurrence of negative values in the corrected datasets. Our results show: (1) Existing BCC methods can result in negative values in 0 %–10 % of the time series for each corrected budget component (typically <5 %); (2) The proposed IWE-Res method improves the accuracy of corrected components compared to existing methods, reducing RMSE by 29.5 % for P, 24.7 % for ET, 69.0 % for Q, and 6.8 % for TWSC; and (3) For most basins, excluding those in cold regions, the optimal redistribution is achieved when 40 %–90 % of ΔRes is redistributed. By offering a more balanced approach to water budget closure, this study improves the accuracy and reliability of corrected budget component datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4607-2025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel method for correcting water budget components and reducing their uncertainties by optimally distributing the imbalance residual without full closure

Xizhang Chen, Hongzhu Fu, Zengliang Luo, Xihui Gu et al.
2 citations
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
article

A novel method for correcting water budget components and reducing their uncertainties by optimally distributing the imbalance residual without full closure

Xizhang Chen, Hongzhu Fu, Zengliang Luo, Xihui Gu, Quanxi Shao, Ranjan Sarukkalige, Lunche Wang, Wen‐Wen Dong, Huan Li, Heqing Huang, Xiangyi Ding
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Achieving water budget closure improves the consistency of water budget component datasets, including precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET), streamflow (Q) and terrestrial water storage change (TWSC), thereby advancing our understanding of basin-scale water cycle dynamics. Existing water budget closure correction (BCC) methods typically aim to eliminate the entire water imbalance error (ΔRes) by fully redistributing it across budget components. However, this often overlooks the trade-off between achieving perfect closure and the errors introduced into the corrected components through this redistribution. Moreover, inaccurate estimation of redistribution weights can lead to contradictory outcomes, such as negative values in P, ET, or Q. In this study, we quantify the uncertainties introduced by four existing BCC methods (CKF, MCL, MSD, and PR) at the monthly scale across 84 basins spanning diverse climate zones. We then propose a novel method, IWE-Res, which identifies an optimal redistributing strategy by minimizing the combined error from both the errors introduced to individual budget components and the remaining ΔRes error. This method also reduces the occurrence of negative values in the corrected datasets. Our results show: (1) Existing BCC methods can result in negative values in 0 %–10 % of the time series for each corrected budget component (typically <5 %); (2) The proposed IWE-Res method improves the accuracy of corrected components compared to existing methods, reducing RMSE by 29.5 % for P, 24.7 % for ET, 69.0 % for Q, and 6.8 % for TWSC; and (3) For most basins, excluding those in cold regions, the optimal redistribution is achieved when 40 %–90 % of ΔRes is redistributed. By offering a more balanced approach to water budget closure, this study improves the accuracy and reliability of corrected budget component datasets.

Hydrology and earth system sciencesVol. 29(18)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Curtin University (AU), China University of Geosciences (CN), China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN), HUN-REN Balaton Limnological Research Institute (HU), Aerospace Information Research Institute (CN), Australian Resources Research Centre (AU), State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science (CN), Data61 (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.