Comparative Efficacy and Cycle-Wise Toxicity of Paclitaxel-Carboplatin Versus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Quasi-experimental Study in Bangladesh

Background Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. In Bangladesh, limited access to novel therapeutics makes platinum-based chemotherapy the mainstay of treatment. This study compares the efficacy and cycle-wise toxicity profiles of paclitaxel-carboplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin in Stage IV NSCLC patients. Methods In this quasi-experimental study, 66 Stage IV NSCLC patients at Ahsania Mission Cancer & General Hospital, Dhaka, received paclitaxel-carboplatin (Group A) or gemcitabine-cisplatin (Group B). Tumor response, six- and nine-month survival, and hematologic (e.g., neutropenia, thrombocytopenia) and non-hematologic (e.g., nausea, vomiting) toxicities were assessed over three chemotherapy cycles. Statistical analysis included Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, or t-tests; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results A partial response was observed in 18 (54.6%) of patients in both groups, with no complete responses recorded. Disease control rates were 26 (78.8%) in Group A and 25 (75.8%) in Group B (p = 0.716). Six-month survival rates were 18 (54.5%) and 20 (60.9%). Nine-month survival rates decreased to 10 (30.3%) and 12 (36.4%), respectively. Group A experienced significantly higher rates of leukopenia and neutropenia across all cycles, with six-cycle incidences of 25 (75.8%) and 26 (78.8%), respectively (p < 0.05). At the same time, thrombocytopenia was notably more common in Group B, with 21 (63.6%) over six cycles (p < 0.05). Non-hematologic toxicities were mild and statistically similar between groups. Conclusions Paclitaxel-carboplatin and gemcitabine-cisplatin demonstrated comparable efficacy and short-term survival. However, their distinct hematologic toxicity profiles highlight the need for individualized regimen selection based on patient tolerance and supportive capacity in resource-limited settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.93093
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Efficacy and Cycle-Wise Toxicity of Paclitaxel-Carboplatin Versus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Quasi-experimental Study in Bangladesh

Mohammad Owaise Sharif, Mohammad Habibur Rahaman, Salman Bashar Al Ayub, Ariful Alam et al.
Cureus
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Comparative Efficacy and Cycle-Wise Toxicity of Paclitaxel-Carboplatin Versus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Quasi-experimental Study in Bangladesh

Mohammad Owaise Sharif, Mohammad Habibur Rahaman, Salman Bashar Al Ayub, Ariful Alam, Hasan Mahmud Iqbal
article en

Abstract

Background Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. In Bangladesh, limited access to novel therapeutics makes platinum-based chemotherapy the mainstay of treatment. This study compares the efficacy and cycle-wise toxicity profiles of paclitaxel-carboplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin in Stage IV NSCLC patients. Methods In this quasi-experimental study, 66 Stage IV NSCLC patients at Ahsania Mission Cancer & General Hospital, Dhaka, received paclitaxel-carboplatin (Group A) or gemcitabine-cisplatin (Group B). Tumor response, six- and nine-month survival, and hematologic (e.g., neutropenia, thrombocytopenia) and non-hematologic (e.g., nausea, vomiting) toxicities were assessed over three chemotherapy cycles. Statistical analysis included Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, or t-tests; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results A partial response was observed in 18 (54.6%) of patients in both groups, with no complete responses recorded. Disease control rates were 26 (78.8%) in Group A and 25 (75.8%) in Group B (p = 0.716). Six-month survival rates were 18 (54.5%) and 20 (60.9%). Nine-month survival rates decreased to 10 (30.3%) and 12 (36.4%), respectively. Group A experienced significantly higher rates of leukopenia and neutropenia across all cycles, with six-cycle incidences of 25 (75.8%) and 26 (78.8%), respectively (p < 0.05). At the same time, thrombocytopenia was notably more common in Group B, with 21 (63.6%) over six cycles (p < 0.05). Non-hematologic toxicities were mild and statistically similar between groups. Conclusions Paclitaxel-carboplatin and gemcitabine-cisplatin demonstrated comparable efficacy and short-term survival. However, their distinct hematologic toxicity profiles highlight the need for individualized regimen selection based on patient tolerance and supportive capacity in resource-limited settings.

CureusVol. 17(9)
Mission Health (US), National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital (BD), Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.