No access for you: modelling the impact of inaccessible streetscapes on disabled people’s mobility

• First UK model linking disabled people’s lives to streetscape barriers. • 408 disabled participants surveyed with EFA, CFA, and SEM analysis. • Top barriers: pavements, blockers, past experiences, councils, roadworks. • Inaccessibility alters habits, erodes trust, and deepens exclusion. • Governance failures harm well-being as much as poor street design. This novel study models the lived experiences of disabled people navigating streetscape barriers through the lens of the impact on their life. 408 disabled people across the UK completed an online questionnaire, analysed through a robust methodology employing Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The research provides the first empirical prioritisation of the most critical barriers in street design and governance. The study identifies the top issues affecting disabled people, ranked by their impact on their life as: Pavement Needs, Pavement Blockers, Previous Negative Experiences, Local Authorities and Roadworks. The study makes three contributions. It provides the first empirically prioritised model of streetscape barriers, establishing an evidence base for targeted interventions. It demonstrates that inaccessibility has long-term effects, as repeated negative encounters alter travel habits, diminish trust in public space, and reinforce exclusion. Finally, it shows that governance matters as much as physical design, with perceptions of neglect and poor communication from local authorities significantly impacting disabled people. Actionable recommendations are drawn out for policymakers and researchers. Future work must now prioritise collaboration with disabled people to build a fairer, more equitable society. This study establishes a critical foundation for addressing systemic inequities in street design, pushing for a paradigm shift toward inclusivity and accountability in urban planning and transport.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101645
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No access for you: modelling the impact of inaccessible streetscapes on disabled people’s mobility

Arun Ulahannan, Paul Herriotts, Stewart Birrell
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

No access for you: modelling the impact of inaccessible streetscapes on disabled people’s mobility

Arun Ulahannan, Paul Herriotts, Stewart Birrell
article en

Abstract

• First UK model linking disabled people’s lives to streetscape barriers. • 408 disabled participants surveyed with EFA, CFA, and SEM analysis. • Top barriers: pavements, blockers, past experiences, councils, roadworks. • Inaccessibility alters habits, erodes trust, and deepens exclusion. • Governance failures harm well-being as much as poor street design. This novel study models the lived experiences of disabled people navigating streetscape barriers through the lens of the impact on their life. 408 disabled people across the UK completed an online questionnaire, analysed through a robust methodology employing Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The research provides the first empirical prioritisation of the most critical barriers in street design and governance. The study identifies the top issues affecting disabled people, ranked by their impact on their life as: Pavement Needs, Pavement Blockers, Previous Negative Experiences, Local Authorities and Roadworks. The study makes three contributions. It provides the first empirically prioritised model of streetscape barriers, establishing an evidence base for targeted interventions. It demonstrates that inaccessibility has long-term effects, as repeated negative encounters alter travel habits, diminish trust in public space, and reinforce exclusion. Finally, it shows that governance matters as much as physical design, with perceptions of neglect and poor communication from local authorities significantly impacting disabled people. Actionable recommendations are drawn out for policymakers and researchers. Future work must now prioritise collaboration with disabled people to build a fairer, more equitable society. This study establishes a critical foundation for addressing systemic inequities in street design, pushing for a paradigm shift toward inclusivity and accountability in urban planning and transport.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 34
Coventry University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.