STREAM PROCESSING IN DECENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURES: CHALLENGES AND ADAPTIVE SOLUTIONS ACROSS CLOUD, FOG, AND EDGE

In recent years, the rapid development of data-driven applications has posed significant challenges for data computation in different domains. Handling and processing continuous data streams have become essential for building data-driven organizations, which places a high burden on traditional computing. As a centralized method, cloud computing often struggles with application latency, mainly because of geographic distance and network bandwidth challenges . The increasing scale and complexity of data, characterized by high volume, velocity, and variety, demand computational infrastructures that are powerful, adaptive, and efficient in terms of pro- cessing. Fog and Edge computing are two decentralized network solutions that move the computation closer to the data source, lowering network traffic while improving the response time. Edge computing performs computations within IoT devices, resulting in real-time data processing and subsequently transferring less time-critical data to the cloud. In contrast, Fog Computing utilizes fog nodes with high computational power for data processing and storage. These nodes are within the same local network, and a decentralized solution is a better choice when working with a large number of IoT devices, the need for local computational power, and storage. Both fog and edge computing rely on cloud infrastructure for long-term data storage and larger computations. This study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of the Fog, Edge, and Cloud computing paradigms, with a particular focus on their applicability to real-time data stream processing. to determine their strengths and ideal use cases in a table and to showcase their advantages and disadvantages in stream processing

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2025.151706
Primary Topic
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STREAM PROCESSING IN DECENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURES: CHALLENGES AND ADAPTIVE SOLUTIONS ACROSS CLOUD, FOG, AND EDGE

Alireza Faghihi Moghaddam
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
article

STREAM PROCESSING IN DECENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURES: CHALLENGES AND ADAPTIVE SOLUTIONS ACROSS CLOUD, FOG, AND EDGE

Alireza Faghihi Moghaddam
article en

Abstract

In recent years, the rapid development of data-driven applications has posed significant challenges for data computation in different domains. Handling and processing continuous data streams have become essential for building data-driven organizations, which places a high burden on traditional computing. As a centralized method, cloud computing often struggles with application latency, mainly because of geographic distance and network bandwidth challenges . The increasing scale and complexity of data, characterized by high volume, velocity, and variety, demand computational infrastructures that are powerful, adaptive, and efficient in terms of pro- cessing. Fog and Edge computing are two decentralized network solutions that move the computation closer to the data source, lowering network traffic while improving the response time. Edge computing performs computations within IoT devices, resulting in real-time data processing and subsequently transferring less time-critical data to the cloud. In contrast, Fog Computing utilizes fog nodes with high computational power for data processing and storage. These nodes are within the same local network, and a decentralized solution is a better choice when working with a large number of IoT devices, the need for local computational power, and storage. Both fog and edge computing rely on cloud infrastructure for long-term data storage and larger computations. This study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of the Fog, Edge, and Cloud computing paradigms, with a particular focus on their applicability to real-time data stream processing. to determine their strengths and ideal use cases in a table and to showcase their advantages and disadvantages in stream processing

Uppsala University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.