Trial by Fire: Experiences of the 2020 Graduates of Pediatric Hospital Medicine Fellowships

Background and objective There is scarce data regarding the preparedness of pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) fellowship graduates for their first attending physician position. Hence, we sought to investigate how prepared PHM fellowship graduates felt in terms of attending-level skills and their satisfaction with their first job. Methods We conducted a national cross-sectional survey with open- and closed-ended questions to assess preparedness for topics taught in the PHM fellowship, and included questions to assess job satisfaction. In 2021, a survey was sent to PHM attendings who graduated from a PHM fellowship in 2020 (approximately one year into their first job). Participants were asked to rate their preparedness for 25 different topics on a 5-point Likert scale and to rate their satisfaction with their fellowship, fellowship director, and first job. We used descriptive statistics for the closed-ended questions. Answers to the open-ended questions were coded on the keywords of each answer. Results Twenty-one out of 42 attendings completed the survey, yielding a 50% response rate. Respondents felt most prepared to lead rounds (4.81/5, standard deviation [SD]: 0.60), teach residents (4.62/5, SD: 0.50), teach medical students (4.43/5, SD: 0.75), manage complex patients (4.19/5, SD: 0.87), and perform consults (4/5, SD: 1.26), and felt least prepared in neonatal resuscitation (2.24/5, SD: 1.41), sedation (1.86/5, SD: 1.01), and point-of-care ultrasound (1.57/5, SD: 0.98). On average, participants were moderately satisfied with their first job after the fellowship (average rating score: 4.33, range: 3-5). Respondents described areas of improvement for fellowship education, including preparation for their first attending job. Conclusions Our study reveals the areas in which respondents felt most and least prepared to perform as a new attending physician. Our findings can assist PHM fellowship program directors in preparing their trainees for entry into the workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.93092
Primary Topic
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trial by Fire: Experiences of the 2020 Graduates of Pediatric Hospital Medicine Fellowships

Jan Fune, Bian Liu, Jeri Kessenich, Leora Mogilner et al.
Cureus
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
article

Trial by Fire: Experiences of the 2020 Graduates of Pediatric Hospital Medicine Fellowships

Jan Fune, Bian Liu, Jeri Kessenich, Leora Mogilner, Weixin Li
article en

Abstract

Background and objective There is scarce data regarding the preparedness of pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) fellowship graduates for their first attending physician position. Hence, we sought to investigate how prepared PHM fellowship graduates felt in terms of attending-level skills and their satisfaction with their first job. Methods We conducted a national cross-sectional survey with open- and closed-ended questions to assess preparedness for topics taught in the PHM fellowship, and included questions to assess job satisfaction. In 2021, a survey was sent to PHM attendings who graduated from a PHM fellowship in 2020 (approximately one year into their first job). Participants were asked to rate their preparedness for 25 different topics on a 5-point Likert scale and to rate their satisfaction with their fellowship, fellowship director, and first job. We used descriptive statistics for the closed-ended questions. Answers to the open-ended questions were coded on the keywords of each answer. Results Twenty-one out of 42 attendings completed the survey, yielding a 50% response rate. Respondents felt most prepared to lead rounds (4.81/5, standard deviation [SD]: 0.60), teach residents (4.62/5, SD: 0.50), teach medical students (4.43/5, SD: 0.75), manage complex patients (4.19/5, SD: 0.87), and perform consults (4/5, SD: 1.26), and felt least prepared in neonatal resuscitation (2.24/5, SD: 1.41), sedation (1.86/5, SD: 1.01), and point-of-care ultrasound (1.57/5, SD: 0.98). On average, participants were moderately satisfied with their first job after the fellowship (average rating score: 4.33, range: 3-5). Respondents described areas of improvement for fellowship education, including preparation for their first attending job. Conclusions Our study reveals the areas in which respondents felt most and least prepared to perform as a new attending physician. Our findings can assist PHM fellowship program directors in preparing their trainees for entry into the workforce.

CureusVol. 17(9)
Grand Rapids Community College (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.