Rail transit ridership changes in COVID-19: Lessons for station area planning in California

Emerging evidence suggests that the recovery of transit ridership post-COVID has been uneven, especially for rail transit. This study aims to understand the station area land use, built form, and transit network characteristics that explain station-level changes in transit ridership pre- and post-COVID, and explores the degree to which those changes are rail transit-specific or the result of overall changes in visits to station areas. Specifically, we examine ridership changes between 2019 and 2021 for 242 rail stations belonging to the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), Sacramento Regional Transit (SACRT), and LA Metro and associate those changes with the built environment, socio-demographics, and rail network characteristics around each station using regression analysis. We also compare these changes in ridership to overall changes in activity aggregated by station area type. We find there was an overall decrease in station-level ridership of 72 %, but changes were not uniform, with 92 stations decreasing more and 152 stations decreasing less. We also find that ridership declined more drastically than overall station area activity across all four rail systems, which implies that rail transit riders were more sensitive to pandemic-related changes than other commuters. The findings suggest that a rail transit ridership recovery strategy should strategize to reinvent and reinforce downtowns as destinations, and shift rail transit services to appeal to non-commute travel, as well as enhance bike and pedestrian accessibility around stations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Urban Mobility
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100153
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rail transit ridership changes in COVID-19: Lessons for station area planning in California

Michael G. McNally, Susan Pike, Daniel Andrés Rodríguez, Meiqing Li
Journal of Urban Mobility
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Rail transit ridership changes in COVID-19: Lessons for station area planning in California

Michael G. McNally, Susan Pike, Daniel Andrés Rodríguez, Meiqing Li
article en

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that the recovery of transit ridership post-COVID has been uneven, especially for rail transit. This study aims to understand the station area land use, built form, and transit network characteristics that explain station-level changes in transit ridership pre- and post-COVID, and explores the degree to which those changes are rail transit-specific or the result of overall changes in visits to station areas. Specifically, we examine ridership changes between 2019 and 2021 for 242 rail stations belonging to the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), Sacramento Regional Transit (SACRT), and LA Metro and associate those changes with the built environment, socio-demographics, and rail network characteristics around each station using regression analysis. We also compare these changes in ridership to overall changes in activity aggregated by station area type. We find there was an overall decrease in station-level ridership of 72 %, but changes were not uniform, with 92 stations decreasing more and 152 stations decreasing less. We also find that ridership declined more drastically than overall station area activity across all four rail systems, which implies that rail transit riders were more sensitive to pandemic-related changes than other commuters. The findings suggest that a rail transit ridership recovery strategy should strategize to reinvent and reinforce downtowns as destinations, and shift rail transit services to appeal to non-commute travel, as well as enhance bike and pedestrian accessibility around stations.

Journal of Urban MobilityVol. 8
University of Central Florida (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Irvine University (US), University of California, Davis (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.