High sensitivity of simulated fog properties to parameterized aerosol activation in case studies from ParisFog
Abstract. Aerosols influence fog properties such as visibility and lifetime by affecting fog droplet number concentrations (Nd). Numerical weather prediction (NWP) models often represent aerosol–fog interactions using highly simplified approaches. Incorporating prognostic size-resolved aerosol microphysics from climate models could allow them to simulate Nd and aerosol–fog interactions without incurring excessive computational expense. However, microphysics code designed for coarse spatial resolution may struggle with sub-kilometer-scale grid spacings. Here, we test the ability of the UK Met Office Unified Model to simulate aerosol and fog properties during case studies from the ParisFog field campaign in 2011. We examine the sensitivity of fog properties to variations in Nd caused by modifications to simulated aerosol activation. Our model, with a 500 m horizontal resolution and interactive aerosol and cloud microphysics, significantly underpredicts Nd, although it only slightly underestimates the cloud condensation nuclei concentration. With an updated version of the Abdul-Razzak and Ghan (2000) activation scheme, we produce Nd that are more consistent with those predicted by a cloud parcel model under fog-like conditions. We activate droplets only by adiabatic cooling. We incorporate more realistic hygroscopicities for sulfate and organic aerosols and explore the sensitivity of simulated Nd to unresolved updrafts. We find that both Nd and simulated fog liquid water content are very sensitive to the updated activation scheme but remain less affected by the update to hygroscopicities. Our improvements offer insights into the physical processes regulating Nd in stable conditions, potentially laying foundations for improved operational fog forecasts that incorporate interactive aerosol simulations or aerosol climatologies.
Authors
- Pratapaditya Ghosh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5402-5479)
- Marie Mazoyer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2604-0292)
- Hyun‐Gyu Kang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6073-918X)
- Salil Mahajan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-8590)
- Anthony C. Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3894-2867)
- Ian Boutle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1485-4475)
- Katherine J. Evans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8174-6450)
- A.H. Hill
- Hamish Gordon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1822-3224)
- Wei Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2601-3198)
- Min Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1285-8301)
- Paul Field
- Noah Asch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4878-1032)
Institutions
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- Met Office (GB)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB)
- Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR)
- Météo-France (FR)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Atmospheric chemistry and physics
- Published
- 2025-09-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11129-2025
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.60