Modern Russian-language texts models comparison for the task of CEFR levels classification

The development of high-quality tools for automatic determination of text levels according to the CEFR scale allows creating educational and testing materials more quickly and objectively. In this paper, the authors examine two types of modern text models: linguistic characteristics and embeddings of large language models for the task of classifying Russian-language texts by six CEFR levels: A1-C2 and three broader categories A, B, C. The two types of models explicitly represent the text as a vector of numerical characteristics. In this case, dividing the text into levels is considered as a common classification task in the field of computational linguistics. The experiments were conducted with our own corpus of 1904 texts. The best quality is achieved by rubert-base-cased-conversational without additional adaptation when determining both six and three text categories. The maximum F-measure value for levels A, B, C is 0.77. The maximum F-measure value for predicting six text categories is 0.67. The quality of text level determination depends more on the model than on the machine learning classification algorithm. The results differ from each other by no more than 0.01-0.02, especially for ensemble methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modeling and Analysis of Information Systems
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18255/1818-1015-2025-3-298-310
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modern Russian-language texts models comparison for the task of CEFR levels classification

Nadezhda Lagutina, Vadim A. Lavrovskiy, Olga B. Lavrovskaya
Modeling and Analysis of Information Systems
Topic Modeling
article

Modern Russian-language texts models comparison for the task of CEFR levels classification

Nadezhda Lagutina, Vadim A. Lavrovskiy, Olga B. Lavrovskaya
article en

Abstract

The development of high-quality tools for automatic determination of text levels according to the CEFR scale allows creating educational and testing materials more quickly and objectively. In this paper, the authors examine two types of modern text models: linguistic characteristics and embeddings of large language models for the task of classifying Russian-language texts by six CEFR levels: A1-C2 and three broader categories A, B, C. The two types of models explicitly represent the text as a vector of numerical characteristics. In this case, dividing the text into levels is considered as a common classification task in the field of computational linguistics. The experiments were conducted with our own corpus of 1904 texts. The best quality is achieved by rubert-base-cased-conversational without additional adaptation when determining both six and three text categories. The maximum F-measure value for levels A, B, C is 0.77. The maximum F-measure value for predicting six text categories is 0.67. The quality of text level determination depends more on the model than on the machine learning classification algorithm. The results differ from each other by no more than 0.01-0.02, especially for ensemble methods.

Modeling and Analysis of Information SystemsVol. 32(3)
Yaroslavl State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modern Russian-language texts models comparison for the task of CEFR levels classification — Nadezhda Lagutina, Vadim A. Lavrovskiy, et al. · Modeling and Analysis of Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS