Conceptual and epistemic bootstrapping of hinge commitments

Some hinge epistemologists have identified the constraints of innate and hardwired cognitive capacities with hinge propositions. My point in this paper is that they have focused only on one part of the story offered by developmental psychology. Another part, addressed here, predicts that cognitive constraints have the potential to be conceptually bootstrapped. The claim is that conceptual bootstrapping provides the subject with rational support for hinge propositions, contrary to the mainstream view in hinge epistemology. First, I introduce the basics of conceptual bootstrapping (§2). Next, I argue that conceptual bootstrapping provides the subject with rational support for hinge commitments (§ 3). §§ 4–6 addresses a possible objections to my proposal. §7 concludes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05273-3
Primary Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual and epistemic bootstrapping of hinge commitments

Paweł Grad
Synthese
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
article

Conceptual and epistemic bootstrapping of hinge commitments

Paweł Grad
article en

Abstract

Some hinge epistemologists have identified the constraints of innate and hardwired cognitive capacities with hinge propositions. My point in this paper is that they have focused only on one part of the story offered by developmental psychology. Another part, addressed here, predicts that cognitive constraints have the potential to be conceptually bootstrapped. The claim is that conceptual bootstrapping provides the subject with rational support for hinge propositions, contrary to the mainstream view in hinge epistemology. First, I introduce the basics of conceptual bootstrapping (§2). Next, I argue that conceptual bootstrapping provides the subject with rational support for hinge commitments (§ 3). §§ 4–6 addresses a possible objections to my proposal. §7 concludes.

SyntheseVol. 206(4)
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.