A Phonological Analysis of Borrowed Nouns from Luganda to Kupsabiny

This paper aims at discussing the phonological patterns exhibited by nouns borrowed from Luganda to Kupsabiny languages spoken in Uganda. Hence the study focuses on answering the research question: how do the phonological patterns of borrowed nouns from Luganda manifest in Kupsabiny? The analysis is cast within the tenets of Optimality Theory (OT) by Prince and Smolensky (1993). Data for analysis was drawn from different sources including elicitation through interviews, focus group discussions and recording of speeches. Findings indicates that borrowed nouns undergo phonological modifications to conform to Kupsabiny’s phonetic inventory. First, Luganda’s syllable structures are either simplified or altered to fit Kupsabiny’s permissible syllable patterns through alteration of consonant clusters, vowel harmony, reduplication, lengthening of vowels, vowel substitution, consonant modification and syllable structure adjustment. Moreover, there is a notable difference in the phonological systems of these two languages as the nouns transform from Luganda to Kupsabiny. Notably, OT’s Faithfulness Constraints preserve the original structure of the borrowed word by minimizing alterations in syllable structure, and segmental composition. However, due to phonotactic differences between Luganda and Kupsabiny, modifications occur to align borrowed words with Kupsabiny’s phonological system. Therefore, there is a need to maintain detailed records of all borrowed nouns and their integration processes by Kupsabiny specialists. This documentation can serve as a reference for linguists and educators, ensuring consistency in usage and teaching.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.908000624
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Phonological Analysis of Borrowed Nouns from Luganda to Kupsabiny

Cherop Kapkwomu Charles, Onyango Janet Achieng’
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

A Phonological Analysis of Borrowed Nouns from Luganda to Kupsabiny

Cherop Kapkwomu Charles, Onyango Janet Achieng’
article en

Abstract

This paper aims at discussing the phonological patterns exhibited by nouns borrowed from Luganda to Kupsabiny languages spoken in Uganda. Hence the study focuses on answering the research question: how do the phonological patterns of borrowed nouns from Luganda manifest in Kupsabiny? The analysis is cast within the tenets of Optimality Theory (OT) by Prince and Smolensky (1993). Data for analysis was drawn from different sources including elicitation through interviews, focus group discussions and recording of speeches. Findings indicates that borrowed nouns undergo phonological modifications to conform to Kupsabiny’s phonetic inventory. First, Luganda’s syllable structures are either simplified or altered to fit Kupsabiny’s permissible syllable patterns through alteration of consonant clusters, vowel harmony, reduplication, lengthening of vowels, vowel substitution, consonant modification and syllable structure adjustment. Moreover, there is a notable difference in the phonological systems of these two languages as the nouns transform from Luganda to Kupsabiny. Notably, OT’s Faithfulness Constraints preserve the original structure of the borrowed word by minimizing alterations in syllable structure, and segmental composition. However, due to phonotactic differences between Luganda and Kupsabiny, modifications occur to align borrowed words with Kupsabiny’s phonological system. Therefore, there is a need to maintain detailed records of all borrowed nouns and their integration processes by Kupsabiny specialists. This documentation can serve as a reference for linguists and educators, ensuring consistency in usage and teaching.

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social ScienceVol. IX(VIII)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.