Practical Guide and Review of Fossil Tip-Dating in Phylogenetics

Phylogenetic tip-dating has been and still is revolutionizing evolutionary biology in several ways. Fossil tip-dating, where fossils are placed into a phylogeny as tips based on morphological and/or molecular character information, provides a more principled approach to infer time-calibrated phylogenies compared with node-dating. Additionally, phylogenetic trees with fossils as tips become more and more important to elucidate evolutionary processes in macroevolutionary studies (e.g., deciphering diversification patterns and directional phenotypic evolution). Fossil tip-dating is slowly gathering popularity in empirical applications and has progressed substantially since its first demonstration in 2011, with respect to improved statistical models, software, and data sets. Nevertheless, executing a phylogenetic fossil tip-dating analysis is complicated and comes with many challenges. Here, we provide an extensive review and overview of methods and models for phylogenetic tip-dating analyses with fossils. We focus both on data collection and preparation and on modeling choices. We start with a survey of all published phylogenetic tip-dating studies to date, showing common data and modeling choices as well as trends toward new approaches. Then, we walk readers through sections of molecular evolution, morphological evolution (both for discrete and continuous data), and lineage evolution (the fossilized birth-death process). In each section, we describe the data and standard models with their underlying assumptions, and provide an outlook and practical recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systematic Biology
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf050
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical Guide and Review of Fossil Tip-Dating in Phylogenetics

Gustavo Darlim, Basanta Khakurel, Alessio Capobianco, Sebastian Höhna et al.
2 citations
Systematic Biology
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
8.66
article

Practical Guide and Review of Fossil Tip-Dating in Phylogenetics

Gustavo Darlim, Basanta Khakurel, Alessio Capobianco, Sebastian Höhna, Nicola S. Heckeberg
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Phylogenetic tip-dating has been and still is revolutionizing evolutionary biology in several ways. Fossil tip-dating, where fossils are placed into a phylogeny as tips based on morphological and/or molecular character information, provides a more principled approach to infer time-calibrated phylogenies compared with node-dating. Additionally, phylogenetic trees with fossils as tips become more and more important to elucidate evolutionary processes in macroevolutionary studies (e.g., deciphering diversification patterns and directional phenotypic evolution). Fossil tip-dating is slowly gathering popularity in empirical applications and has progressed substantially since its first demonstration in 2011, with respect to improved statistical models, software, and data sets. Nevertheless, executing a phylogenetic fossil tip-dating analysis is complicated and comes with many challenges. Here, we provide an extensive review and overview of methods and models for phylogenetic tip-dating analyses with fossils. We focus both on data collection and preparation and on modeling choices. We start with a survey of all published phylogenetic tip-dating studies to date, showing common data and modeling choices as well as trends toward new approaches. Then, we walk readers through sections of molecular evolution, morphological evolution (both for discrete and continuous data), and lineage evolution (the fossilized birth-death process). In each section, we describe the data and standard models with their underlying assumptions, and provide an outlook and practical recommendations.

Systematic BiologyVol. 75(1)
Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
8.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.